IBMRvsBSMQETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMR's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, BSMQ's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.18% for BSMQ. IBMR is up 0.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$139M in YTD flows. BSMQ performs better with 1.51% YTD performance, and -$42M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMR and BSMQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMR vs BSMQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMR BSMQ | -0.03%+0.17% | -0.73%+0.33% | +0.09%+1.51% | +0.54%+2.09% | +12.70%+10.86% | n/a+2.61% |
| Flows | IBMR BSMQ | +$22M-$9M | +$50M-$24M | +$139M-$42M | +$213M-$31M | +$506M+$141M | -+$235M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMR BSMQ | +2.33%+0.65% | +1.50%+0.47% | +2.41%+1.20% | n/a+2.01% |
| Max drawdown | IBMR BSMQ | -2.47%-0.38% | -2.75%-0.38% | -2.98%-1.47% | n/a-11.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMR BSMQ | 52d44d | 232d44d | 212d68d | n/a1347d |
Trading data
IBMR | BSMQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.96 | $23.48 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.93 | $23.49 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBMR | BSMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMR | BSMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.96 | $23.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $507.40 M | $258.71 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
IBMR | BSMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2029 Index | ICE BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2026 Index |
| N° of holdings | 820 | 641 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 9, 2023 | September 13, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMR
USA
51.44%
Other
48.56%
BSMQ
USA
50.89%
Other
49.11%
Sectors
IBMR
Municipal
50.4%
Other
49.6%
BSMQ
Municipal
50.89%
Other
49.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.71%
BSMQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMR
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
1.04%
US13034A5B23
0.74%
US575829PH38
0.55%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD
0.52%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2026)
0.45%
New York Dormitory Authority, 2.5% 1jul1993, USD
0.39%
Houston, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2018B)
0.38%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2017-A)
0.38%
California, 5% 1oct2029, USD
0.34%
Palm Beach School Board, 5% 1aug2029, USD (2018C)
0.34%
US18085PTF17
0.33%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1apr2029, USD (2026)
0.33%
California, 5% 1sep2029, USD
0.33%
US13063EUP95
0.31%
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, 5% 1mar2029, USD (2018B)
0.29%
BSMQ
US451295ZZ58
1.44%
US64972GDC50
1.07%
US160853UL92
0.77%
Maryland Department of Transportation, 5% 1oct2026, USD (2019)
0.64%
US64579FYL11
0.59%
US20775HAA14
0.57%
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, FRN 15jan2048, USD (2018H)
0.54%
US604115CT06
0.54%
US095175VQ53
0.50%
Illinois Toll Highway Authority, 5% 1jan2040, USD
0.47%
US167560SV44
0.47%
US59261AX695
0.46%
US917393CY40
0.44%
US160853MR54
0.44%
Columbus (OH), 5% 1jun2032, USD (2015)
0.43%
Frequently asked questions about IBMR and BSMQ
How have the IBMR and BSMQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMR is up 0.09% year-to-date (YTD), while BSMQ has returned 1.51%. That puts BSMQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMR or BSMQ?
Year-to-date, the IBMR ETF saw +$139M in flows, compared to -$42M for BSMQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMR or BSMQ?
Over the past year, IBMR had a volatility of 1.5%, while BSMQ experienced 0.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMR or BSMQ?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMR holds $507.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while BSMQ manages $258.71 M.
What sectors do the IBMR and BSMQ ETFs invest in?
IBMR leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, BSMQ focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMR ETF and BSMQ ETF?
IBMR top holdings include BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, US13034A5B23 and US575829PH38. BSMQ holds in its top three: US451295ZZ58, US64972GDC50 and US160853UL92.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMR or BSMQ?
IBMR holds 1822 securities with 6.71% of its assets in the top 15. BSMQ has 1271 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.37%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
