IBMQvsVCRMETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMQ's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, VCRM's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.12% for VCRM. IBMQ is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$112M in YTD flows. VCRM performs worse with -1.33% YTD performance, and +$1.84B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMQ and VCRM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMQ vs VCRM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMQ VCRM | +0.01%-0.38% | -0.28%-3.26% | +0.95%-1.33% | +1.38%-0.75% | +11.22%n/a | +3.03%n/a |
| Flows | IBMQ VCRM | +$13M+$677M | +$34M+$905M | +$112M+$1.84B | +$172M+$2.06B | +$468M- | +$617M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMQ VCRM | +1.51%+5.29% | +0.99%+3.35% | +1.79%n/a | +2.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMQ VCRM | -1.57%-5.68% | -1.57%-6.33% | -2.26%n/a | -10.68%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMQ VCRM | 52d92d | 52d102d | 212dn/a | 1300dn/a |
Trading data
IBMQ | VCRM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.27 | $72.58 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $25.27 | $72.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VCRM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIBMQ | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMQ | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.27 | $72.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $683.47 M | $2.59 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.12% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMQ
USA
48.81%
Other
51.19%
VCRM
USA
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Sectors
IBMQ
Municipal
48.73%
Other
51.27%
VCRM
Municipal
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Diversification
IBMQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.74%
VCRM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMQ
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023)
0.56%
US13034A5B23
0.51%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2028, USD (2020E)
0.48%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1jan2028, USD (2017)
0.42%
US235219UU41
0.40%
California, 5% 1oct2030, USD
0.39%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1feb2050, USD
0.38%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2028, USD
0.38%
New York Transitional Finance Authority, 5% 15jul2031, USD
0.36%
Illinois, 5% 1oct2028, USD (2018A)
0.33%
US60374VEW90
0.32%
Missouri Board of Public Buildings, 4% 1oct2028, USD
0.31%
US18085PTE42
0.30%
North Texas Tollway Authority, 0% 1jan2028, USD (2008D, 7212D)
0.30%
US161045NS42
0.30%
VCRM
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
0.71%
US09182TEC71
0.61%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022)
0.53%
Jefferson Sales Tax District, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2017B)
0.52%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2042, USD (2021-A)
0.48%
State of Hawaii, 4% 1may2036, USD
0.47%
US625517PJ02
0.46%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.45%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1apr2035, USD (2026A)
0.44%
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 6% 1jan2057, USD (2026B)
0.44%
Energy Southeast, 5% 1sep2033, USD (2025B)
0.42%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 1jul2062, USD (2023-1, A)
0.41%
US235330AW70
0.40%
US57563WAC29
0.40%
Indiana Finance Authority, 5% 1oct2046, USD (2016A)
0.38%
Frequently asked questions about IBMQ and VCRM
How have the IBMQ and VCRM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMQ is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while VCRM has lost -1.33%. That puts IBMQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMQ or VCRM?
Year-to-date, the IBMQ ETF saw +$112M in flows, compared to +$1.84B for VCRM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMQ or VCRM?
Over the past year, IBMQ had a volatility of 0.99%, while VCRM experienced 3.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMQ or VCRM?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMQ holds $683.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while VCRM manages $2.59 B.
What sectors do the IBMQ and VCRM ETFs invest in?
IBMQ leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VCRM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMQ ETF and VCRM ETF?
IBMQ top holdings include New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023), US13034A5B23 and New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2028, USD (2020E). VCRM holds in its top three: Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025), US09182TEC71 and Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022).
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMQ or VCRM?
IBMQ holds 2776 securities with 5.74% of its assets in the top 15. VCRM has 2385 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.11%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
