IBMQvsITMETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) and VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMQ's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, ITM's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.18% for ITM. IBMQ is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$112M in YTD flows. ITM performs worse with -2.88% YTD performance, and +$176M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMQ and ITM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMQ vs ITM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMQ ITM | +0.01%+0.07% | -0.28%-3.17% | +0.95%-2.88% | +1.38%-2.05% | +11.22%+10.27% | +3.03%-0.94% |
| Flows | IBMQ ITM | +$13M+$174M | +$34M+$110M | +$112M+$176M | +$172M+$259M | +$468M+$343M | +$617M+$507M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMQ ITM | +1.51%+5.25% | +0.99%+3.33% | +1.79%+3.74% | +2.37%+3.77% |
| Max drawdown | IBMQ ITM | -1.57%-5.93% | -1.57%-7.74% | -2.26%-7.74% | -10.68%-14.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMQ ITM | 52d92d | 52d229d | 212d229d | 1300d1387d |
Trading data
IBMQ | ITM | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.29 | $44.68 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $25.27 | $44.83 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBMQ | ITM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMQ | ITM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.29 | $44.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $683.47 M | $2.20 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
IBMQ | ITM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index | ICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index |
| N° of holdings | 908 | 680 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 16, 2019 | December 4, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMQ
USA
48.81%
Other
51.19%
ITM
USA
52.78%
Other
47.22%
Sectors
IBMQ
Municipal
48.73%
Other
51.27%
ITM
Municipal
52.78%
Other
47.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.74%
ITM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMQ
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023)
0.56%
US13034A5B23
0.51%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2028, USD (2020E)
0.48%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1jan2028, USD (2017)
0.42%
US235219UU41
0.40%
California, 5% 1oct2030, USD
0.39%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1feb2050, USD
0.38%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2028, USD
0.38%
New York Transitional Finance Authority, 5% 15jul2031, USD
0.36%
Illinois, 5% 1oct2028, USD (2018A)
0.33%
US60374VEW90
0.32%
Missouri Board of Public Buildings, 4% 1oct2028, USD
0.31%
US18085PTE42
0.30%
North Texas Tollway Authority, 0% 1jan2028, USD (2008D, 7212D)
0.30%
US161045NS42
0.30%
ITM
US646067KE77
0.55%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1aug2055, USD (2024C)
0.51%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024F)
0.47%
California, 4% 1mar2036, USD
0.45%
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1jul2064, USD (2025B-2)
0.39%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1jan2056, USD (2024H)
0.38%
US74440DFC39
0.33%
US64972GE267
0.30%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.30%
US63607WBD56
0.29%
California Housing Finance Agency, 3.75% 25mar2035, USD (2021-2, A)
0.29%
Southeast Energy Authority, 5.25% 1nov2055, USD (2025F)
0.28%
US569203NS77
0.28%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 4% 1jun2051, USD (2021A)
0.27%
Commonwealth Financing Authority, 4% 1jun2039, USD (2018)
0.25%
Frequently asked questions about IBMQ and ITM
How have the IBMQ and ITM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMQ is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while ITM has lost -2.88%. That puts IBMQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMQ or ITM?
Year-to-date, the IBMQ ETF saw +$112M in flows, compared to +$176M for ITM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMQ or ITM?
Over the past year, IBMQ had a volatility of 0.99%, while ITM experienced 3.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMQ or ITM?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMQ holds $683.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while ITM manages $2.20 B.
What sectors do the IBMQ and ITM ETFs invest in?
IBMQ leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, ITM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMQ ETF and ITM ETF?
IBMQ top holdings include New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 1mar2028, USD (2023), US13034A5B23 and New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2028, USD (2020E). ITM holds in its top three: US646067KE77, California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1aug2055, USD (2024C) and California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024F).
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMQ or ITM?
IBMQ holds 2776 securities with 5.74% of its assets in the top 15. ITM has 1325 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.34%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
