IBMPvsVTESETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTES) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMP's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, VTES's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.05% for VTES. IBMP is up 1.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$92M in YTD flows. VTES performs worse with 0.05% YTD performance, and +$2.52B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMP and VTES below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMP vs VTES performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMP VTES | +0.10%+0.15% | +0.20%-0.72% | +1.54%+0.05% | +2.00%+0.53% | +10.92%+9.70% | +3.92%n/a |
| Flows | IBMP VTES | +$19M+$1.06B | +$46M+$1.95B | +$92M+$2.52B | +$123M+$2.69B | +$393M+$3.87B | +$628M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMP VTES | +0.66%+2.60% | +0.50%+1.59% | +1.26%+1.59% | +1.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMP VTES | -0.57%-2.66% | -0.57%-2.95% | -1.45%-2.95% | -9.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMP VTES | 46d64d | 46d232d | 195d232d | 1260dn/a |
Trading data
IBMP | VTES | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.26 | $99.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $25.24 | $99.50 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBMP | VTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMP | VTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.26 | $99.59 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $688.23 M | $4.08 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.05% |
Characteristics
IBMP | VTES | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2027 Index | S&P 0-7 Year National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 677 | 1671 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 9, 2019 | March 9, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMP
USA
50.25%
Other
49.75%
VTES
USA
52.32%
Other
47.68%
Sectors
IBMP
Municipal
49.71%
Other
50.29%
VTES
Municipal
52.32%
Other
47.68%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.33%
VTES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMP
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.55%
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.32%
US100853UQ10
0.32%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
VTES
US13063EUN48
0.91%
US13063EUM64
0.86%
US13063EUP95
0.78%
US13063EUU80
0.42%
North Colonie Central School District, 3.75% 25jun2027, USD (2026)
0.40%
US13063EUQ78
0.38%
US13063EUS35
0.30%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2028, USD (2017D)
0.22%
US64972JQM35
0.21%
US13063ENN21
0.19%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.19%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2032, USD (2024)
0.19%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD
0.19%
Pennsylvania Public School Building Authority, 5% 1jun2033, USD (2016A)
0.18%
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, 5% 15jun2042, USD
0.18%
Frequently asked questions about IBMP and VTES
How have the IBMP and VTES ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMP is up 1.54% year-to-date (YTD), while VTES has returned 0.05%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMP or VTES?
Year-to-date, the IBMP ETF saw +$92M in flows, compared to +$2.52B for VTES.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMP or VTES?
Over the past year, IBMP had a volatility of 0.5%, while VTES experienced 1.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMP or VTES?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMP holds $688.23 M in assets under management (AUM), while VTES manages $4.08 B.
What sectors do the IBMP and VTES ETFs invest in?
IBMP leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VTES focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMP ETF and VTES ETF?
IBMP top holdings include BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016) and California, 5% 1apr2027, USD. VTES holds in its top three: US13063EUN48, US13063EUM64 and US13063EUP95.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMP or VTES?
IBMP holds 1831 securities with 5.33% of its assets in the top 15. VTES has 3442 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.61%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBMP & VTES
Advertisement
