IBMPvsVGVTETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) belongs to the Municipal Bonds segment. Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) is part of the US Government Bonds segment. IBMP's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, VGVT's top sector exposures are Sovereign and Government Agencies. Both IBMP and VGVT have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%. IBMP is up 1.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$65M in YTD flows. VGVT performs worse with -0.12% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMP and VGVT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMP vs VGVT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMP VGVT | +0.30%+0.37% | +0.63%-0.34% | +1.58%-0.12% | +2.16%+1.75% | +9.66%n/a | +3.12%n/a |
| Flows | IBMP VGVT | +$9M+$370K | +$20M-$7M | +$65M+$4M | +$103M+$23M | +$380M- | +$605M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMP VGVT | +0.34%+3.57% | +0.47%+3.49% | +1.34%n/a | +1.95%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMP VGVT | -0.10%-1.47% | -0.42%-2.89% | -1.69%n/a | -9.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMP VGVT | 20d63d | 90d183d | 74dn/a | 1399dn/a |
Trading data
IBMP | VGVT | |
Last sale 8/31/2026 at 7:59 PM | $25.40 | $74.08 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $25.40 | $74.12 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VGVT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIBMP | VGVT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/31/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
IBMP | VGVT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.40 | $74.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $663.67 M | $36.66 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMP
USA
51.41%
Other
48.59%
VGVT
USA
44.65%
Other
55.35%
Sectors
IBMP
Municipal
51.06%
Other
48.94%
VGVT
Sovereign
43.19%
Other
56.81%
Diversification
IBMP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.18%
VGVT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IBMP
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.35%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.33%
US100853UQ10
0.33%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
VGVT
US3136B1K865
4.73%
US3136B4KB37
2.35%
US3136AY6U29
2.17%
US01F0526800
2.13%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30jun2030, USD (AA-2030)
2.10%
USA, Notes 4% 31mar2030, USD (W-2030)
2.05%
USA, Notes 3.5% 15oct2028, USD (AT-2028)
1.80%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31aug2030, USD (P-2030)
1.76%
USA, Notes 4% 30apr2032, USD (K-2032)
1.64%
USA, Notes 4.625% 30apr2029, USD (Y-2029)
1.22%
USA, Notes 4.25% 31jan2030, USD (U-2030)
1.22%
US3136G5ZX16
1.15%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31jul2030, USD (AB-2030)
1.14%
US3138LM6U27
1.13%
USA, Notes 3.75% 31oct2032, USD (R-2032)
1.03%
Frequently asked questions about IBMP and VGVT
How have the IBMP and VGVT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, IBMP is up 1.58% year-to-date (YTD), while VGVT has lost -0.12%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMP or VGVT?
Year-to-date, the IBMP ETF saw +$65M in flows, compared to +$4M for VGVT.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMP or VGVT?
Over the past year, IBMP had a volatility of 0.47%, while VGVT experienced 3.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMP or VGVT?
As of August 31, 2026, IBMP holds $663.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while VGVT manages $36.66 M.
What sectors do the IBMP and VGVT ETFs invest in?
IBMP leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VGVT focuses on Sovereign.
What are the top holdings of the IBMP ETF and VGVT ETF?
IBMP top holdings include Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016), California, 5% 1apr2027, USD and US91412HTM50. VGVT holds in its top three: US3136B1K865, US3136B4KB37 and US3136AY6U29.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMP or VGVT?
IBMP holds 1833 securities with 5.18% of its assets in the top 15. VGVT has 252 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBMP & VGVT
Advertisement
