New

From idea to ETF portfolio in minutes. Build yours now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

IBMPvsMINOETF Comparison

ETF 1
IBMP

iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
-0.42%
VS
ETF 2
MINO

PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF

This fund is part of
Municipal Bonds
-0.42%

iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active ETF (MINO) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMP's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, MINO's top sector exposures are Municipal and Sovereign. IBMP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.49% for MINO. IBMP is up 1.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$65M in YTD flows. MINO performs worse with -0.54% YTD performance, and +$310M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMP and MINO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

IBMP vs MINO performance and flow charts

Performance

-1.0-0.50.00.5%Aug 3Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31

Cumulative Flows

0 M5 M10 M15 M20 M25 M30 MAug 3Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
IBMP
MINO
+0.22%-1.15%
+0.60%-2.26%
+1.55%-0.54%
+2.12%+3.83%
+9.67%+12.14%
+3.11%n/a
Flows
IBMP
MINO
+$8M+$30M
+$20M+$109M
+$65M+$310M
+$103M+$435M
+$380M+$689M
+$605M-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
IBMP
MINO
+0.35%+3.03%
+0.47%+2.60%
+1.34%+3.83%
+1.95%n/a
Max drawdown
IBMP
MINO
-0.10%-3.08%
-0.42%-3.08%
-1.67%-5.25%
-9.68%n/a
Max drawdown duration
IBMP
MINO
20d58d
90d58d
63d274d
1375dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
IBMP
MINO
Last sale
9/1/2026 at 7:59 PM
$25.33
$44.24
Previous close
09/01/2026
$25.40
$44.23
Consolidated volume
09/01/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

MINO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
IBMP
MINO
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/1/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
IBMP
MINO
Last price
$25.33
$44.24
1D performance
-0.28%
+0.01%
AuM$661.99 M$755.68 M
E/R0.1%0.49%
Characteristics
IBMP
MINO
Management strategyPassiveActive
ProvideriSharesPIMCO
BenchmarkS&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2027 Index-
N° of holdings693121
Asset classFixed Income-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateAugust 9, 2019September 8, 2021
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

IBMP
USA
51.41%
Other
48.59%
MINO
USA
51.38%
Other
48.62%

Sectors

IBMP
Municipal
51.06%
Other
48.94%
MINO
Municipal
45.23%
Other
54.77%

Diversification

IBMP

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

5.18%
MINO

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

18.83%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
IBMP
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.35%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.33%
US100853UQ10
0.33%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
MINO
USA, Notes 3.375% 29feb2028, USD (AY-2028)
2.23%
US20775DTS17
1.86%
USA, Notes 3.5% 28feb2031, USD (V-2031)
1.79%
Georgia Municipal Electric Authority, 5% 1jan2049, USD (2019A)
1.46%
New York Transitional Finance Authority, 5.25% 1may2048, USD (2025D)
1.39%
US60412AM678
1.17%
USA, Notes 4.625% 30apr2031, USD (K-2031)
1.07%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0% 1jul2046, USD (10001D)
1.07%
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5% 1dec2040, USD (2026)
1.02%
US882118AS16
1.00%
Cuyahoga, 5% 1dec2051, USD (2026)
0.96%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jan2034, USD (2026)
0.96%
US5755793L99
0.96%
US590545J420
0.96%
US87638QSL40
0.93%
Frequently asked questions about IBMP and MINO

How have the IBMP and MINO ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 1, 2026, IBMP is up 1.55% year-to-date (YTD), while MINO has lost -0.54%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMP or MINO?

Year-to-date, the IBMP ETF saw +$65M in flows, compared to +$310M for MINO.

Which ETF is more volatile: IBMP or MINO?

Over the past year, IBMP had a volatility of 0.47%, while MINO experienced 2.6%.

Which ETF is bigger: IBMP or MINO?

As of September 1, 2026, IBMP holds $661.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while MINO manages $755.68 M.

What sectors do the IBMP and MINO ETFs invest in?

IBMP leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, MINO focuses on Municipal.

What are the top holdings of the IBMP ETF and MINO ETF?

IBMP top holdings include Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016), California, 5% 1apr2027, USD and US91412HTM50. MINO holds in its top three: USA, Notes 3.375% 29feb2028, USD (AY-2028), US20775DTS17 and USA, Notes 3.5% 28feb2031, USD (V-2031).

Which ETF is more diversified: IBMP or MINO?

IBMP holds 1833 securities with 5.18% of its assets in the top 15. MINO has 276 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.83%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up