IBMPvsCGHMETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMP's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, CGHM's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.34% for CGHM. IBMP is up 1.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$92M in YTD flows. CGHM performs worse with -1.27% YTD performance, and +$1.21B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMP and CGHM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMP vs CGHM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMP CGHM | +0.10%-0.63% | +0.20%-3.99% | +1.54%-1.27% | +2.00%-0.65% | +10.92%n/a | +3.92%n/a |
| Flows | IBMP CGHM | +$19M+$300M | +$46M+$501M | +$92M+$1.21B | +$123M+$1.42B | +$393M- | +$628M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMP CGHM | +0.66%+5.57% | +0.50%+3.65% | +1.26%n/a | +1.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMP CGHM | -0.57%-6.27% | -0.57%-6.96% | -1.45%n/a | -9.31%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMP CGHM | 46d92d | 46d110d | 195dn/a | 1260dn/a |
Trading data
IBMP | CGHM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.26 | $24.42 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $25.24 | $24.43 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGHM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexIBMP | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMP | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.26 | $24.42 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $688.23 M | $3.56 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
IBMP | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2027 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 677 | 845 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 9, 2019 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
IBMP
USA
50.25%
Other
49.75%
CGHM
USA
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Sectors
IBMP
Municipal
49.71%
Other
50.29%
CGHM
Municipal
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.33%
CGHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBMP
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.55%
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.32%
US100853UQ10
0.32%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
CGHM
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD
1.31%
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD
0.86%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD
0.61%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0% 1jul2046, USD (10001D)
0.53%
US419800PW17
0.50%
Chicago Board of Education, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2012A)
0.44%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, 4% 1sep2046, USD (2026A)
0.43%
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, 5% 1jul2047, USD (2020A)
0.42%
City of New York, FRN 1apr2042, USD
0.35%
Capital Trust Agency, 5% 1jul2056, USD (2021A-1)
0.34%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jun2036, USD (2026)
0.33%
US45203HAH57
0.33%
US83703FLR19
0.33%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1jun2034, USD (2026)
0.32%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1oct2040, USD (2020)
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about IBMP and CGHM
How have the IBMP and CGHM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMP is up 1.54% year-to-date (YTD), while CGHM has lost -1.27%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMP or CGHM?
Year-to-date, the IBMP ETF saw +$92M in flows, compared to +$1.21B for CGHM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMP or CGHM?
Over the past year, IBMP had a volatility of 0.5%, while CGHM experienced 3.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMP or CGHM?
As of October 16, 2026, IBMP holds $688.23 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGHM manages $3.56 B.
What sectors do the IBMP and CGHM ETFs invest in?
IBMP leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CGHM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMP ETF and CGHM ETF?
IBMP top holdings include BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016) and California, 5% 1apr2027, USD. CGHM holds in its top three: Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD, Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD and Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMP or CGHM?
IBMP holds 1831 securities with 5.33% of its assets in the top 15. CGHM has 2608 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
