IBMPvsBSMVETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) and Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. IBMP's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, BSMV's top sector exposures are Municipal. IBMP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.18% for BSMV. IBMP is up 1.58% year-to-date (YTD) with +$65M in YTD flows. BSMV performs worse with -0.18% YTD performance, and +$36M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBMP and BSMV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBMP vs BSMV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBMP BSMV | +0.30%+0.22% | +0.63%-0.65% | +1.58%-0.18% | +2.16%+2.71% | +9.66%+9.13% | +3.12%n/a |
| Flows | IBMP BSMV | +$9M+$6M | +$20M+$10M | +$65M+$36M | +$103M+$80M | +$380M+$165M | +$605M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBMP BSMV | +0.34%+1.93% | +0.47%+1.98% | +1.34%+3.71% | +1.95%n/a |
| Max drawdown | IBMP BSMV | -0.10%-1.58% | -0.42%-2.60% | -1.69%-5.17% | -9.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBMP BSMV | 20d56d | 90d183d | 74d271d | 1399dn/a |
Trading data
IBMP | BSMV | |
Last sale 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.40 | $20.69 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $25.40 | $20.73 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBMP | BSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBMP | BSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.40 | $20.69 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $663.67 M | $192.00 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
IBMP | BSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2027 Index | Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2031 Index |
| N° of holdings | 693 | 650 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 9, 2019 | September 15, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBMP
USA
51.41%
Other
48.59%
BSMV
USA
53.44%
Other
46.56%
Sectors
IBMP
Municipal
51.06%
Other
48.94%
BSMV
Municipal
53.44%
Other
46.56%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBMP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.18%
BSMV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
IBMP
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.35%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.33%
US100853UQ10
0.33%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
BSMV
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2051, USD (2021A)
0.67%
Illinois Toll Highway Authority, 5% 1jan2045, USD
0.62%
New Jersey, 4% 1jun2031, USD
0.62%
University of California, 5% 15may2046, USD
0.34%
US13032UE388
0.34%
California, 4% 1oct2041, USD
0.33%
California, 5% 1sep2041, USD
0.32%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 15aug2002, USD
0.31%
US45884AC273
0.31%
US13063DM705
0.30%
Massachusetts, 5% 1sep2031, USD (2021)
0.30%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15nov2051, USD (2021A)
0.30%
US646140JN47
0.30%
Maryland, 5% 1mar2034, USD
0.29%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 1oct2037, USD (2023A)
0.27%
Frequently asked questions about IBMP and BSMV
How have the IBMP and BSMV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, IBMP is up 1.58% year-to-date (YTD), while BSMV has lost -0.18%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBMP or BSMV?
Year-to-date, the IBMP ETF saw +$65M in flows, compared to +$36M for BSMV.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBMP or BSMV?
Over the past year, IBMP had a volatility of 0.47%, while BSMV experienced 1.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBMP or BSMV?
As of August 31, 2026, IBMP holds $663.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while BSMV manages $192.00 M.
What sectors do the IBMP and BSMV ETFs invest in?
IBMP leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, BSMV focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the IBMP ETF and BSMV ETF?
IBMP top holdings include Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016), California, 5% 1apr2027, USD and US91412HTM50. BSMV holds in its top three: Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2051, USD (2021A), Illinois Toll Highway Authority, 5% 1jan2045, USD and New Jersey, 4% 1jun2031, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBMP or BSMV?
IBMP holds 1833 securities with 5.18% of its assets in the top 15. BSMV has 1482 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.62%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
