IBLCvsFDIGETF Comparison
VS
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) belongs to the Blockchain segment. Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) is part of the Multiple Trends segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. IBLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.39% for FDIG. IBLC is down -10.4% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. FDIG performs worse with -13.88% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBLC and FDIG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBLC vs FDIG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBLC FDIG | -8.56%-9.62% | -16.39%-18.23% | -10.40%-13.88% | +46.31%+29.54% | +152.28%+119.03% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBLC FDIG | -$2M-$11K | -$4M-$9M | -$4M-$9M | +$38M+$47M | +$61M+$167M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBLC FDIG | +65.13%+52.38% | +58.17%+50.69% | +61.27%+57.43% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBLC FDIG | -29.05%-30.59% | -44.73%-46.49% | -51.49%-48.88% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBLC FDIG | 73d73d | 169d169d | 274d274d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBLC | FDIG | |
Last sale 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.68 | $33.07 |
| Previous close 04/02/2026 | $36.49 | $32.88 |
| Consolidated volume 04/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBLC | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBLC | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.68 | $33.07 |
| 1D performance | +0.52% | +0.56% |
| AuM | $68.07 M | $213.20 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
IBLC | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index | Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 27, 2022 | April 19, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBLC
USA
80.05%
Australia
8.85%
Cayman Islands
7.4%
Other
3.7%
FDIG
USA
68.91%
Cayman Islands
8.78%
Other
22.31%
Sectors
IBLC
Information Techn.
52.63%
Financials
11.56%
Other
35.81%
FDIG
Information Techn.
56.58%
Financials
10.48%
Other
32.93%
Diversification
IBLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.37%
FDIG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of February 28, 2026
IBLC
US1725731079
9.40%
COINBASE GLOBAL
9.29%
IRIS ENERGY LTD
8.85%
US09175A2069
6.10%
APPLIED BLOCKCHAIN
5.29%
US44812J1043
4.77%
NVIDIA
4.68%
RIOT BLOCKCHAIN INC
4.51%
MASTERCARD
4.35%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
4.31%
CIPHER MINING INC
4.27%
US21874A1060
4.26%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
3.85%
TERAWULF INC
3.80%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP
3.63%
FDIG
US1725731079
5.15%
IRIS ENERGY LTD
5.06%
COINBASE GLOBAL
4.73%
TERAWULF INC
4.63%
APPLIED BLOCKCHAIN
4.35%
RIOT BLOCKCHAIN INC
3.81%
US44812J1043
3.50%
CIPHER MINING INC
3.45%
US09175A2069
3.04%
US21874A1060
2.93%
BLOCK INC
2.90%
MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS
2.55%
CLEANSPARK INC
2.24%
US36317J2096
2.12%
US2199481068
2.01%
Frequently asked questions about IBLC and FDIG
How have the IBLC and FDIG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 2, 2026, IBLC is down -10.4% year-to-date (YTD), while FDIG has lost -13.88%. That puts IBLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBLC or FDIG?
Year-to-date, the IBLC ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$9M for FDIG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBLC or FDIG?
Over the past year, IBLC had a volatility of 58.17%, while FDIG experienced 50.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBLC or FDIG?
As of April 2, 2026, IBLC holds $68.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDIG manages $213.20 M.
What sectors do the IBLC and FDIG ETFs invest in?
IBLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, FDIG focuses on Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the IBLC ETF and FDIG ETF?
IBLC top holdings include US1725731079, COINBASE GLOBAL and IRIS ENERGY LTD. FDIG holds in its top three: US1725731079, IRIS ENERGY LTD and COINBASE GLOBAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBLC or FDIG?
IBLC holds 37 securities with 81.37% of its assets in the top 15. FDIG has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.47%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBLC & FDIG
Coinbase Stocks Jump as Binance Pleads Guilty to Federal Charges of Money Laundering
November 28, 2023
IBLC
FDIG
Advertisement
Advertisement
