IBLCvsFDIGETF Comparison
VS
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) belongs to the Blockchain segment. Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) is part of the Multiple Trends segment. IBLC's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Non-Corporate. In contrast, FDIG's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Business Services. IBLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.39% for FDIG. IBLC is down -6.48% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. FDIG performs better with -5.31% YTD performance, and -$36M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBLC and FDIG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBLC vs FDIG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBLC FDIG | -13.97%-14.36% | -10.17%-10.76% | -6.48%-5.31% | -34.38%-33.29% | +163.27%+137.06% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBLC FDIG | -$2M-$8M | -$2M-$10M | -$6M-$36M | +$8M-$25M | +$58M+$123M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBLC FDIG | +56.41%+43.90% | +58.16%+48.96% | +62.13%+56.15% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBLC FDIG | -25.35%-22.92% | -44.09%-44.46% | -51.49%-48.88% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBLC FDIG | 24d24d | 354d354d | 274d274d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBLC | FDIG | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.34 | $36.03 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $40.98 | $38.14 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBLC | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBLC | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.34 | $36.03 |
| 1D performance | -6.44% | -5.55% |
| AuM | $69.13 M | $211.80 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
IBLC | FDIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index | Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 58 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 27, 2022 | April 19, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
IBLC
USA
83.61%
Other
16.39%
FDIG
USA
73.6%
Other
26.4%
Sectors
IBLC
Finance
70.57%
Technology
29.24%
Other
0.18%
FDIG
Finance
89.78%
Technology
9.38%
Other
0.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.9%
FDIG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
IBLC
Coinbase Global, Inc.
15.80%
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
9.79%
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
7.87%
IREN Ltd.
6.62%
Mastercard, Inc.
5.12%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.59%
Hut 8 Corp.
4.41%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.31%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
4.26%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
3.63%
Applied Digital Corp.
3.61%
International Business Machines Corp.
3.50%
Cipher Digital, Inc.
2.85%
TeraWulf, Inc.
2.85%
Core Scientific, Inc.
2.69%
FDIG
Coinbase Global, Inc.
5.60%
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
4.89%
Circle Internet Group, Inc.
4.42%
Block, Inc.
3.67%
IREN Ltd.
3.40%
Chime Financial, Inc.
2.81%
MARA Holdings, Inc.
2.60%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
2.51%
Applied Digital Corp.
2.47%
Toast, Inc.
2.23%
TeraWulf, Inc.
2.19%
Hut 8 Corp.
2.18%
Global Payments, Inc.
2.17%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Cipher Digital, Inc.
2.12%
Frequently asked questions about IBLC and FDIG
How have the IBLC and FDIG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, IBLC is down -6.48% year-to-date (YTD), while FDIG has lost -5.31%. That puts FDIG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBLC or FDIG?
Year-to-date, the IBLC ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$36M for FDIG.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBLC or FDIG?
Over the past year, IBLC had a volatility of 58.16%, while FDIG experienced 48.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBLC or FDIG?
As of October 16, 2026, IBLC holds $69.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDIG manages $211.80 M.
What sectors do the IBLC and FDIG ETFs invest in?
IBLC leans toward sectors like Finance and Technology. Meanwhile, FDIG focuses on Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IBLC ETF and FDIG ETF?
IBLC top holdings include Coinbase Global, Inc., Circle Internet Group, Inc. and Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.. FDIG holds in its top three: Coinbase Global, Inc., Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. and Circle Internet Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBLC or FDIG?
IBLC holds 40 securities with 81.9% of its assets in the top 15. FDIG has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.4%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBLC & FDIG
Coinbase Stocks Jump as Binance Pleads Guilty to Federal Charges of Money Laundering
November 28, 2023
IBLC
FDIG
Advertisement
