IBATvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Industrials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.65% for SETM. IBAT is up 43.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. SETM performs worse with 26.27% YTD performance, and +$284M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT SETM | +23.83%+15.12% | +25.65%-4.22% | +43.26%+26.27% | +100.21%+157.43% | n/a+128.08% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBAT SETM | +$16M+$33M | +$26M+$157M | +$41M+$284M | +$43M+$447M | -+$482M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT SETM | +31.44%+46.65% | +23.88%+34.79% | n/a+29.88% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBAT SETM | -11.58%-23.48% | -11.92%-23.48% | n/a-41.59% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT SETM | 42d86d | 79d86d | n/a427d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBAT | SETM | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.86 | $35.88 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $41.10 | $37.16 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.86 | $35.88 |
| 1D performance | -0.58% | -3.44% |
| AuM | $62.28 M | $606.96 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 71 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
22.93%
USA
21.54%
Republic of Korea
15.5%
France
9.33%
China
9.01%
Other
21.71%
SETM
Canada
29.53%
USA
26.15%
Australia
24.33%
Other
19.99%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
39.65%
Materials
35.25%
Information Techn.
19.44%
Other
5.66%
SETM
Materials
61.9%
Energy
19.79%
Other
18.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.3%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
7.05%
BASF SE
6.63%
AIR LIQUIDE
6.38%
SAMSUNG SDI
6.34%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
6.13%
MURATA MFG
5.62%
AMPEREX TECH
5.35%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.57%
FURUKAWA ELEC
4.54%
ASAHI KASEI
4.21%
LG CHEMICAL
3.42%
EATON CORP PLC
3.23%
IE000S9YS762
3.18%
ABB
2.86%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.82%
SETM
US63253R2013
5.55%
ALBEMARLE
5.44%
LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED
5.43%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
5.38%
PILBARA MINERALS
5.24%
CAMECO
4.83%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
4.13%
URANIUM ENERGY
3.55%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
3.07%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
2.73%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.66%
LUNDIN MINING
2.61%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
2.47%
ANTOFAGASTA
2.45%
DENISON MINES
2.31%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and SETM
How have the IBAT and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, IBAT is up 43.26% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has returned 26.27%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or SETM?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$284M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or SETM?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 23.88%, while SETM experienced 34.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or SETM?
As of April 27, 2026, IBAT holds $62.28 M in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $606.96 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and SETM ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and SETM ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, BASF SE and AIR LIQUIDE. SETM holds in its top three: US63253R2013, ALBEMARLE and LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or SETM?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 72.3% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 85 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.85%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
SETM
Advertisement
Advertisement
