IBATvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.65% for SETM. IBAT is up 28.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$53M in YTD flows. SETM performs worse with -1.66% YTD performance, and +$333M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT SETM | -17.28%-8.16% | -10.29%-21.35% | +28.29%-1.66% | +53.02%+45.40% | n/a+65.61% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBAT SETM | --$18M | +$12M+$47M | +$53M+$333M | +$55M+$485M | -+$530M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT SETM | +40.52%+40.55% | +30.09%+38.48% | n/a+31.44% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBAT SETM | -23.46%-27.19% | -23.46%-28.06% | n/a-41.59% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT SETM | 36d78d | 36d181d | n/a427d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBAT | SETM | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 4:41 PM | $35.43 | $27.59 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $36.43 | $28.33 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 4:41 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.43 | $27.59 |
| 1D performance | -2.74% | -2.61% |
| AuM | $65.78 M | $505.86 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 154 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
29.75%
USA
22.4%
Republic of Korea
11.39%
France
9.43%
China
8.84%
Other
18.2%
SETM
Canada
31.17%
USA
23.26%
Australia
21.86%
Other
23.71%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
44.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
33.71%
Technology
15.76%
Other
6.31%
SETM
Non-Energy Materi.
74.01%
Energy
24.12%
Other
1.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.83%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
IBAT
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.29%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
7.18%
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
6.04%
Air Liquide SA
5.97%
TDK Corp.
5.67%
BASF SE
5.44%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.13%
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.
3.96%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
3.86%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.56%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.39%
Schneider Electric SE
3.35%
Linde Plc
3.15%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.94%
Asahi Kasei Corp.
2.89%
SETM
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.37%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
5.33%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
5.08%
Cameco Corp.
5.07%
PLS Group Ltd.
4.20%
Albemarle Corp.
3.69%
MP Materials Corp.
3.42%
Uranium Energy Corp.
3.33%
Teck Resources Limited
3.26%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.15%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
2.93%
Antofagasta Plc
2.78%
First Majestic Silver Corp.
2.69%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.56%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.54%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and SETM
How have the IBAT and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, IBAT is up 28.29% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has lost -1.66%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or SETM?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to +$333M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or SETM?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 30.09%, while SETM experienced 38.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or SETM?
As of July 28, 2026, IBAT holds $65.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $505.86 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and SETM ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and SETM ETF?
IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.. SETM holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or SETM?
IBAT holds 83 securities with 70.83% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 156 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.42%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
SETM
Advertisement
Advertisement
