IBATvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Industrials. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.65% for SETM. IBAT is up 51.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$53M in YTD flows. SETM performs worse with 13.45% YTD performance, and +$351M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT SETM | -1.05%-15.59% | +29.58%-5.88% | +51.84%+13.45% | +101.92%+102.21% | n/a+92.88% | n/an/a |
| Flows | IBAT SETM | +$11M+$20M | +$29M+$100M | +$53M+$351M | +$55M+$511M | -+$550M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT SETM | +33.97%+42.28% | +27.32%+37.55% | n/a+30.85% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | IBAT SETM | -13.79%-19.70% | -13.79%-23.48% | n/a-41.59% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT SETM | 10d32d | 10d135d | n/a427d | n/an/a |
Trading data
IBAT | SETM | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.49 | $34.24 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $43.03 | $33.23 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.49 | $34.24 |
| 1D performance | +1.07% | +3.04% |
| AuM | $78.17 M | $603.86 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
IBAT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 61 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
USA
23.61%
Japan
23%
Republic of Korea
17.91%
France
7.89%
China
7.6%
Other
19.98%
SETM
Canada
28.29%
Australia
24.33%
USA
19.7%
Other
27.68%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
42.9%
Materials
29.9%
Information Techn.
22.53%
Other
4.66%
SETM
Materials
60.02%
Energy
19.33%
Other
20.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
75.04%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
11.41%
SAMSUNG SDI
8.64%
MURATA MFG
6.68%
BASF SE
5.46%
FURUKAWA ELEC
5.25%
AIR LIQUIDE
5.18%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
4.91%
AMPEREX TECH
4.54%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.26%
LG CHEMICAL
3.63%
ASAHI KASEI
3.36%
DELTA ELECTRONIC
3.26%
EATON CORP PLC
3.02%
ABB
2.83%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.61%
SETM
PILBARA MINERALS
5.90%
ALBEMARLE
5.13%
LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED
5.05%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
4.83%
CAMECO
4.69%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
3.56%
URANIUM ENERGY
3.45%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
3.40%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.78%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
2.76%
LIONTOWN RESOURCES LTD
2.51%
ANTOFAGASTA
2.38%
LUNDIN MINING
2.38%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
2.32%
DENISON MINES
2.23%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and SETM
How have the IBAT and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, IBAT is up 51.84% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has returned 13.45%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or SETM?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to +$351M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or SETM?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 27.32%, while SETM experienced 37.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or SETM?
As of June 12, 2026, IBAT holds $78.17 M in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $603.86 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and SETM ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and SETM ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, SAMSUNG SDI and MURATA MFG. SETM holds in its top three: PILBARA MINERALS, ALBEMARLE and LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or SETM?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 75.04% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.37%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
SETM
Advertisement
Advertisement
