IBATvsQCLNETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-1.53%
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, QCLN's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.56% for QCLN. IBAT is up 44.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$39M in YTD flows. QCLN performs worse with 28.08% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and QCLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs QCLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT QCLN | +23.75%+22.66% | +28.54%+12.95% | +44.60%+28.08% | +103.87%+117.10% | n/a+21.04% | n/a-14.45% |
| Flows | IBAT QCLN | +$15M+$36M | +$24M+$26M | +$39M+$26M | +$42M-$13M | --$665M | --$1.11B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT QCLN | +31.38%+40.22% | +23.80%+34.04% | n/a+35.01% | n/a+38.17% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT QCLN | -11.58%-15.86% | -11.92%-15.86% | n/a-56.02% | n/a-69.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT QCLN | 42d75d | 79d75d | n/a1008d | n/a1627d |
Trading data
IBAT | QCLN | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.14 | $57.22 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $41.45 | $56.97 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.14 | $57.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.75% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $61.21 M | $707.99 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 44 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | February 8, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
22.93%
USA
21.54%
Republic of Korea
15.5%
France
9.33%
China
9.01%
Other
21.71%
QCLN
USA
93.38%
Other
6.62%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
39.65%
Materials
35.25%
Information Techn.
19.44%
Other
5.66%
QCLN
Information Techn.
37.59%
Industrials
21.96%
Consumer Discreti.
11.9%
Utilities
8.79%
Materials
8.04%
Other
11.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.3%
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
IBAT
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
7.05%
BASF SE
6.63%
AIR LIQUIDE
6.38%
SAMSUNG SDI
6.34%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS
6.13%
MURATA MFG
5.62%
AMPEREX TECH
5.35%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
4.57%
FURUKAWA ELEC
4.54%
ASAHI KASEI
4.21%
LG CHEMICAL
3.42%
EATON CORP PLC
3.23%
IE000S9YS762
3.18%
ABB
2.86%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
2.82%
QCLN
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
8.07%
TESLA
7.80%
ON SEMICONDUCTOR
7.71%
FIRST SOLAR
7.13%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
7.01%
US65290E1010
4.72%
ALBEMARLE
4.11%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES
4.08%
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE
4.01%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
3.90%
ACUITY BRANDS
3.39%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
3.31%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
2.66%
ENERSYS
2.52%
ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS
2.38%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and QCLN
How have the IBAT and QCLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, IBAT is up 44.6% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLN has returned 28.08%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or QCLN?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$39M in flows, compared to +$26M for QCLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or QCLN?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 23.8%, while QCLN experienced 34.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or QCLN?
As of April 24, 2026, IBAT holds $61.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while QCLN manages $707.99 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and QCLN ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, QCLN focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and QCLN ETF?
IBAT top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, BASF SE and AIR LIQUIDE. QCLN holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, TESLA and ON SEMICONDUCTOR.
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or QCLN?
IBAT holds 64 securities with 72.3% of its assets in the top 15. QCLN has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 72.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & QCLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
Advertisement
Advertisement
