IBATvsQCLNETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-3.44%
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, QCLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.56% for QCLN. IBAT is up 28.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$53M in YTD flows. QCLN performs worse with 7.93% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and QCLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs QCLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT QCLN | -17.28%-18.29% | -10.29%-12.58% | +28.29%+7.93% | +53.02%+30.27% | n/a-9.25% | n/a-23.95% |
| Flows | IBAT QCLN | --$90M | +$12M-$23M | +$53M+$15M | +$55M+$16M | --$656M | --$1.10B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT QCLN | +40.52%+52.92% | +30.09%+40.27% | n/a+37.36% | n/a+39.23% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT QCLN | -23.46%-29.69% | -23.46%-29.69% | n/a-54.60% | n/a-69.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT QCLN | 36d56d | 36d56d | n/a991d | n/a1723d |
Trading data
IBAT | QCLN | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.43 | $46.48 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $36.43 | $48.12 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.43 | $46.48 |
| 1D performance | -2.73% | -3.41% |
| AuM | $65.78 M | $577.36 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
IBAT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 79 | 51 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 19, 2024 | February 8, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
29.75%
USA
22.4%
Republic of Korea
11.39%
France
9.43%
China
8.84%
Other
18.2%
QCLN
USA
91.85%
Other
8.15%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
44.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
33.71%
Technology
15.76%
Other
6.31%
QCLN
Industrials
32.39%
Technology
32.32%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.81%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.45%
Utilities
8.23%
Other
3.8%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.83%
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
IBAT
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.29%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
7.18%
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
6.04%
Air Liquide SA
5.97%
TDK Corp.
5.67%
BASF SE
5.44%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.13%
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.
3.96%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
3.86%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.56%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.39%
Schneider Electric SE
3.35%
Linde Plc
3.15%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.94%
Asahi Kasei Corp.
2.89%
QCLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.07%
Tesla, Inc.
8.72%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
7.60%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
7.01%
First Solar, Inc.
6.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
4.71%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
4.12%
Vicor Corp.
3.61%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
3.58%
Albemarle Corp.
3.45%
Acuity, Inc.
3.39%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.32%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.17%
MP Materials Corp.
2.94%
EnerSys
2.45%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and QCLN
How have the IBAT and QCLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, IBAT is up 28.29% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLN has returned 7.93%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or QCLN?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to +$15M for QCLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or QCLN?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 30.09%, while QCLN experienced 40.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or QCLN?
As of July 28, 2026, IBAT holds $65.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while QCLN manages $577.36 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and QCLN ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, QCLN focuses on Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and QCLN ETF?
IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.. QCLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., Tesla, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or QCLN?
IBAT holds 83 securities with 70.83% of its assets in the top 15. QCLN has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & QCLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
Advertisement
Advertisement
