IBATvsPBWETF Comparison
VS
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.64% for PBW. IBAT is up 28.29% year-to-date (YTD) with +$53M in YTD flows. PBW performs worse with 2.31% YTD performance, and -$297M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
IBAT vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | IBAT PBW | -17.28%-18.29% | -10.29%-13.81% | +28.29%+2.31% | +53.02%+29.54% | n/a-22.38% | n/a-57.71% |
| Flows | IBAT PBW | --$15M | +$12M+$27M | +$53M-$297M | +$55M-$63M | --$147M | --$403M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | IBAT PBW | +40.52%+50.84% | +30.09%+43.05% | n/a+41.20% | n/a+43.26% |
| Max drawdown | IBAT PBW | -23.46%-33.47% | -23.46%-33.47% | n/a-67.97% | n/a-84.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | IBAT PBW | 36d56d | 36d56d | n/a1012d | n/a1723d |
Trading data
IBAT | PBW | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.43 | $29.86 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $36.43 | $31.10 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IBAT | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
IBAT | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.43 | $29.86 |
| 1D performance | -2.73% | -3.99% |
| AuM | $65.78 M | $383.14 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.64% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
IBAT
Japan
29.75%
USA
22.4%
Republic of Korea
11.39%
France
9.43%
China
8.84%
Other
18.2%
PBW
USA
80.33%
Other
19.67%
Sectors
IBAT
Industrials
44.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
33.71%
Technology
15.76%
Other
6.31%
PBW
Industrials
48.7%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.84%
Technology
13.52%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
8.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
IBAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.83%
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
IBAT
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.29%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
7.18%
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
6.04%
Air Liquide SA
5.97%
TDK Corp.
5.67%
BASF SE
5.44%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.13%
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.
3.96%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
3.86%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.56%
Eaton Corp. Plc
3.39%
Schneider Electric SE
3.35%
Linde Plc
3.15%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.94%
Asahi Kasei Corp.
2.89%
PBW
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
2.98%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp.
2.41%
MYR Group, Inc.
2.23%
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.23%
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
2.21%
Powell Industries, Inc.
1.92%
IonQ, Inc.
1.85%
Preformed Line Products Co.
1.85%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
1.84%
Bel Fuse, Inc.
1.81%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
1.80%
ioneer Ltd.
1.80%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.
1.73%
First Solar, Inc.
1.61%
Frequently asked questions about IBAT and PBW
How have the IBAT and PBW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, IBAT is up 28.29% year-to-date (YTD), while PBW has returned 2.31%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or PBW?
Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to -$297M for PBW.
Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or PBW?
Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 30.09%, while PBW experienced 43.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or PBW?
As of July 28, 2026, IBAT holds $65.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBW manages $383.14 M.
What sectors do the IBAT and PBW ETFs invest in?
IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, PBW focuses on Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and PBW ETF?
IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.. PBW holds in its top three: FuelCell Energy, Inc., Hyliion Holdings Corp. and Navitas Semiconductor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or PBW?
IBAT holds 83 securities with 70.83% of its assets in the top 15. PBW has 68 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about IBAT & PBW
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
PBW
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
PBW
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
