BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

IBATvsLITETF Comparison

ETF 1

IBAT

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+0.78%

Full IBAT fund page

VS

ETF 2

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery ETF

This fund is part of

Alternative Energy

+0.78%

Full LIT fund page

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF (IBAT) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. IBAT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. IBAT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.75% for LIT. IBAT is up 33.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$53M in YTD flows. LIT performs worse with 6.7% YTD performance, and -$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of IBAT and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

IBAT vs LIT performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 07/27/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	IBAT LIT	-13.89%-10.65%	-6.77%-18.33%	+33.55%+6.70%	+59.30%+59.79%	n/a+9.25%	n/a-6.80%
Flows	IBAT LIT	--$66M	+$14M-$118M	+$53M-$64M	+$55M-$67M	--$1.35B	--$1.19B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	IBAT LIT	+39.77%+29.62%	+29.86%+28.47%	n/a+26.42%	n/a+26.23%
Max drawdown	IBAT LIT	-20.32%-25.43%	-20.32%-25.43%	n/a-49.84%	n/a-64.51%
Max drawdown duration	IBAT LIT	35d77d	35d77d	n/a875d	n/a1708d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	IBAT	LIT
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 2:36 PM	$36.40	$66.71
Previous close 07/27/2026	$38.11	$68.63
Consolidated volume 07/27/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of June 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	IBAT	LIT
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 7/28/2026 at 2:36 PM

Live

Closed

	IBAT	LIT
Last price	$36.40	$66.71
1D performance	-4.50%	-2.80%
AuM	$68.48 M	$1.51 B
E/R	0.47%	0.75%

Characteristics

	IBAT	LIT
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	iShares	Global X
Benchmark	STOXX Global Energy Storage and Materials Index	Solactive Global Lithium Index
N° of holdings	79	36
Asset class	-	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	March 19, 2024	July 22, 2010
ESG	Yes	Yes

More IBAT data on Trackinsight

More LIT data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

IBAT

Japan

29.75%

USA

22.4%

Republic of Korea

11.39%

France

9.43%

China

8.84%

Other

18.2%

LIT

China

33.64%

United Kingdom

20.11%

Japan

12.05%

USA

11.43%

Republic of Korea

10.17%

Australia

7.24%

Other

5.36%

Sectors

IBAT

Industrials

44.22%

Non-Energy Materi.

33.71%

Technology

15.76%

Other

6.31%

LIT

Non-Energy Materi.

50.33%

Industrials

20.56%

Technology

14.95%

Consumer Cyclical.

7.24%

Other

6.92%

Diversification

IBAT

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

70.83%

LIT

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

78.8%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026

IBAT

Bloom Energy Corp.

9.29%

Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

7.18%

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

6.04%

Air Liquide SA

5.97%

TDK Corp.

5.67%

BASF SE

5.44%

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

4.13%

Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.

3.96%

Resonac Holdings Corp.

3.86%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.

3.56%

Eaton Corp. Plc

3.39%

Schneider Electric SE

3.35%

Linde Plc

3.15%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.

2.94%

Asahi Kasei Corp.

2.89%

LIT

Rio Tinto Plc

20.11%

NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.

7.75%

Panasonic Holdings Corp.

6.13%

TDK Corp.

5.92%

Albemarle Corp.

4.51%

Tesla, Inc.

4.50%

Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

4.34%

EVE Energy Co., Ltd.

3.77%

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.

3.69%

LG Energy Solution Ltd.

3.62%

PLS Group Ltd.

3.04%

Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.

2.96%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA

2.94%

Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.

2.78%

BYD Co., Ltd.

2.73%

Frequently asked questions about IBAT and LIT

How have the IBAT and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 27, 2026, IBAT is up 33.55% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 6.7%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or LIT?

Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to -$64M for LIT.

Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or LIT?

Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 29.86%, while LIT experienced 28.47%.

Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or LIT?

As of July 27, 2026, IBAT holds $68.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.51 B.

What sectors do the IBAT and LIT ETFs invest in?

IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and LIT ETF?

IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.. LIT holds in its top three: Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or LIT?

IBAT holds 83 securities with 70.83% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.8%.

Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs

July 8, 2024

LIT

Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?

November 7, 2022

LIT

IBATvsLITETF Comparison

iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF

Global X Lithium & Battery ETF

IBAT vs LIT performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the IBAT and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 27, 2026, IBAT is up 33.55% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 6.7%. That puts IBAT better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: IBAT or LIT?

Year-to-date, the IBAT ETF saw +$53M in flows, compared to -$64M for LIT.

Which ETF is more volatile: IBAT or LIT?

Over the past year, IBAT had a volatility of 29.86%, while LIT experienced 28.47%.

Which ETF is bigger: IBAT or LIT?

As of July 27, 2026, IBAT holds $68.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.51 B.

What sectors do the IBAT and LIT ETFs invest in?

IBAT leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the IBAT ETF and LIT ETF?

IBAT top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.. LIT holds in its top three: Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: IBAT or LIT?

IBAT holds 83 securities with 70.83% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.8%.

Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs

Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?

Build and Analyze Your ETF Portfolio Like a Pro