New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

HYLSvsLQDHETF Comparison

ETF 1
HYLS

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF

This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.61%
VS
ETF 2
LQDH

iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF

This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.61%

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. HYLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. HYLS is up 1.97% year-to-date (YTD) with -$71M in YTD flows. LQDH performs better with 2.78% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HYLS and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

HYLS vs LQDH performance and flow charts

Performance

0.00.51.01.5%Oct 2Oct 9Oct 16Oct 23Oct 30

Cumulative Flows

-30 M-20 M-10 M0 M10 M20 MOct 2Oct 9Oct 16Oct 23Oct 30

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
HYLS
LQDH
+1.40%-0.36%
-1.06%+0.42%
+1.97%+2.78%
+2.72%+4.41%
+19.01%+21.58%
+9.92%+28.33%
Flows
HYLS
LQDH
-$6M+$14M
+$26M+$65M
-$71M+$27M
-$56M+$74M
+$207M+$346M
-$318M-$52M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
HYLS
LQDH
+3.24%+2.28%
+3.13%+2.58%
+3.42%+3.29%
+5.20%+4.32%
Max drawdown
HYLS
LQDH
-3.27%-0.89%
-3.27%-2.26%
-3.27%-4.48%
-16.13%-6.71%
Max drawdown duration
HYLS
LQDH
78d5d
78d82d
78d104d
1066d437d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
HYLS
LQDH
Last sale
11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM
$39.72
$91.72
Previous close
11/02/2026
$39.66
$91.94
Consolidated volume
11/02/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

HYLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
HYLS
LQDH
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
HYLS
LQDH
Last price
$39.72
$91.72
1D performance
+0.15%
-0.24%
AuM$1.61 B$596.59 M
E/R0.69%0.44%
Characteristics
HYLS
LQDH
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderFirst TrustiShares
Benchmark-BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index
N° of holdings--
Asset class--
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateFebruary 25, 2013May 27, 2014
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

HYLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon

Sectors

HYLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon

Diversification

HYLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of January 1, 1970
HYLS
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about HYLS and LQDH

How have the HYLS and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?

As of November 2, 2026, HYLS is up 1.97% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 2.78%. That puts LQDH better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HYLS or LQDH?

Year-to-date, the HYLS ETF saw -$71M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.

Which ETF is more volatile: HYLS or LQDH?

Over the past year, HYLS had a volatility of 3.13%, while LQDH experienced 2.58%.

Which ETF is bigger: HYLS or LQDH?

As of November 2, 2026, HYLS holds $1.61 B in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $596.59 M.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
New Report

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection

Global ETF Survey 2026