HQGOvsACVUETF Comparison
VS
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) and Hartford Quality Value ETF (ACVU) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. HQGO's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, ACVU's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. HQGO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.45% for ACVU. HQGO is up 13.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$51M in YTD flows. ACVU performs better with 17.17% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HQGO and ACVU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
HQGO vs ACVU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HQGO ACVU | +2.99%+1.15% | +2.96%+2.66% | +13.64%+17.17% | +16.25%+21.83% | n/a+59.20% | n/an/a |
| Flows | HQGO ACVU | -$47M+$91M | -$47M+$84M | -$51M+$71M | -$51M+$49M | -+$35M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HQGO ACVU | +11.59%+9.03% | +13.90%+11.17% | n/a+12.09% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | HQGO ACVU | -3.71%-4.72% | -10.39%-7.58% | n/a-13.24% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | HQGO ACVU | 56d66d | 94d59d | n/a283d | n/an/a |
Trading data
HQGO | ACVU | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.38 | $32.00 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $66.86 | $32.03 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACVU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexHQGO | ACVU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
HQGO | ACVU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.38 | $32.00 |
| 1D performance | +0.79% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $3.40 M | $275.30 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.45% |
Characteristics
HQGO | ACVU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Hartford Funds | Hartford Funds |
| Benchmark | Hartford US Quality Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 161 | 870 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 5, 2023 | October 13, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
HQGO
USA
97.15%
Other
2.85%
ACVU
USA
94.95%
Other
5.05%
Sectors
HQGO
Technology
51.91%
Healthcare
10.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.18%
Finance
7.62%
Other
20.06%
ACVU
Technology
21.13%
Finance
19.56%
Healthcare
14.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.1%
Industrials
9.03%
Other
22.45%
Advertisement
Diversification
HQGO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.38%
ACVU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.54%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
HQGO
NVIDIA Corp.
5.90%
Apple, Inc.
5.12%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.81%
Microsoft Corp.
4.79%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.71%
Broadcom Inc.
3.35%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.58%
Visa, Inc.
2.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.06%
Tesla, Inc.
1.99%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.95%
Johnson & Johnson
1.84%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.79%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.75%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.64%
ACVU
Microsoft Corp.
7.26%
Amazon.com, Inc.
6.75%
Apple, Inc.
4.17%
ConocoPhillips
3.91%
Chubb Ltd.
2.95%
Johnson & Johnson
2.17%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.08%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.07%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.97%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.92%
Visa, Inc.
1.83%
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.
1.67%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.62%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.61%
Exelon Corp.
1.57%
Frequently asked questions about HQGO and ACVU
How have the HQGO and ACVU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, HQGO is up 13.64% year-to-date (YTD), while ACVU has returned 17.17%. That puts ACVU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HQGO or ACVU?
Year-to-date, the HQGO ETF saw -$51M in flows, compared to +$71M for ACVU.
Which ETF is more volatile: HQGO or ACVU?
Over the past year, HQGO had a volatility of 13.9%, while ACVU experienced 11.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: HQGO or ACVU?
As of October 15, 2026, HQGO holds $3.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACVU manages $275.30 M.
What sectors do the HQGO and ACVU ETFs invest in?
HQGO leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, ACVU focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the HQGO ETF and ACVU ETF?
HQGO top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.. ACVU holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HQGO or ACVU?
HQGO holds 161 securities with 46.38% of its assets in the top 15. ACVU has 880 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.54%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
