HNDLvsBDYNETF Comparison
VS
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. HNDL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.94%, versus 0.4% for BDYN. HNDL is up 4.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. BDYN performs better with 7.34% YTD performance, and +$587M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HNDL and BDYN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
HNDL vs BDYN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HNDL BDYN | +0.35%-0.24% | -2.66%-0.49% | +4.71%+7.34% | +5.03%+11.15% | +39.33%n/a | +19.29%n/a |
| Flows | HNDL BDYN | +$4M+$53M | +$17M+$110M | -$10M+$587M | -$30M+$709M | -$393M- | -$316M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HNDL BDYN | +7.03%+12.40% | +7.43%+14.33% | +9.63%n/a | +11.82%n/a |
| Max drawdown | HNDL BDYN | -4.85%-4.07% | -5.00%-10.91% | -11.72%n/a | -23.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | HNDL BDYN | 61d64d | 46d92d | 206dn/a | 961dn/a |
Trading data
HNDL | BDYN | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.72 | $27.53 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $21.82 | $27.46 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BDYN
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexHNDL | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
HNDL | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.72 | $27.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.48% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $627.08 M | $3.09 B |
| E/R | 0.94% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
HNDL | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Strategy Shares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq 7HANDL Base Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2018 | September 12, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
HNDL
Data will be available soon
BDYN
Data will be available soon
Sectors
HNDL
Data will be available soon
BDYN
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
HNDL
Data will be available soon
BDYN
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
HNDL
Data will be available soon
BDYN
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about HNDL and BDYN
How have the HNDL and BDYN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, HNDL is up 4.71% year-to-date (YTD), while BDYN has returned 7.34%. That puts BDYN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HNDL or BDYN?
Year-to-date, the HNDL ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$587M for BDYN.
Which ETF is more volatile: HNDL or BDYN?
Over the past year, HNDL had a volatility of 7.43%, while BDYN experienced 14.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: HNDL or BDYN?
As of October 16, 2026, HNDL holds $627.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while BDYN manages $3.09 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
