HLALvsIWBETF Comparison
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. HLAL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.15% for IWB. HLAL is up 18.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$112M in YTD flows. IWB performs worse with 12.4% YTD performance, and -$2.78B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HLAL and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HLAL vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HLAL IWB | +1.69%+1.32% | +3.24%+1.69% | +18.54%+12.40% | +24.37%+16.05% | +75.76%+80.00% | +94.46%+75.80% |
| Flows | HLAL IWB | +$13M-$318M | +$16M-$660M | +$112M-$2.78B | +$90M-$1.18B | +$317M-$2.89B | +$452M-$2.75B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HLAL IWB | +14.54%+11.33% | +15.43%+12.88% | +16.52%+15.16% | +18.21%+17.29% |
| Max drawdown | HLAL IWB | -4.52%-3.22% | -10.16%-8.86% | -21.86%-19.16% | -23.16%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | HLAL IWB | 13d53d | 76d76d | 217d126d | 555d709d |
HLAL | IWB | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:55 PM | $73.81 | $418.08 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $73.33 | $416.77 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HLAL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HLAL | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.81 | $418.08 |
| 1D performance | +0.65% | +0.31% |
| AuM | $965.74 M | $48.57 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
