Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
HEGDvsXYLGETF Comparison
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF (HEGD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. HEGD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, XYLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. HEGD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.88%, versus 0.35% for XYLG. HEGD is down -0.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. XYLG performs worse with -1.1% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HEGD and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HEGD vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HEGD XYLG | -1.12%-1.38% | -0.95%-0.38% | -0.90%-1.10% | +14.45%+16.79% | +48.85%+59.52% | +47.54%+61.28% |
| Flows | HEGD XYLG | -$7M-$276K | +$12M+$4M | +$9M+$2M | +$185M+$1M | +$388M+$8M | +$486M+$64M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HEGD XYLG | +6.03%+9.63% | +8.36%+15.78% | +8.15%+12.21% | +9.17%+13.94% |
| Max drawdown | HEGD XYLG | -2.11%-3.04% | -4.69%-12.29% | -8.39%-17.16% | -14.21%-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | HEGD XYLG | 44d15d | 36d48d | 124d154d | 721d736d |
HEGD | XYLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.94 | $26.75 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.03 | $26.91 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HEGD | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HEGD | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.94 | $26.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $604.13 M | $63.29 M |
| E/R | 0.88% | 0.35% |
HEGD | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Swan Capital Management | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 479 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 23, 2020 | June 21, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the HEGD and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, HEGD is down -0.9% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has lost -1.1%. That puts HEGD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HEGD or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the HEGD ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$2M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: HEGD or XYLG?
Over the past year, HEGD had a volatility of 8.36%, while XYLG experienced 15.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: HEGD or XYLG?
As of March 12, 2026, HEGD holds $604.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $63.29 M.
What sectors do the HEGD and XYLG ETFs invest in?
HEGD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, XYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the HEGD ETF and XYLG ETF?
HEGD top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: HEGD or XYLG?
HEGD holds 502 securities with 39.41% of its assets in the top 15. XYLG has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
