Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
HDMVvsEFAVETF Comparison
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed International ETF
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed International ETF (HDMV) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. HDMV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, EFAV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. HDMV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.2% for EFAV. HDMV is up 5.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. EFAV performs better with 5.4% YTD performance, and -$41M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HDMV and EFAV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HDMV vs EFAV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HDMV EFAV | -2.56%-1.77% | +7.80%+6.95% | +5.25%+5.40% | +23.11%+20.48% | +50.73%+54.42% | +45.22%+45.72% |
| Flows | HDMV EFAV | -+$13M | -$7M-$41M | -$7M-$41M | -$19M-$646M | -$31M-$3.74B | -$77M-$5.65B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HDMV EFAV | +9.32%+9.35% | +11.17%+11.12% | +10.06%+10.03% | +10.80%+11.22% |
| Max drawdown | HDMV EFAV | -5.59%-4.37% | -7.90%-7.49% | -10.66%-9.09% | -23.78%-27.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | HDMV EFAV | 9d9d | 11d27d | 156d232d | 1080d1058d |
HDMV | EFAV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.07 | $90.68 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $37.17 | $91.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HDMV | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HDMV | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.07 | $90.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $16.81 M | $5.41 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.2% |
HDMV | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index |
| N° of holdings | 138 | 233 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 24, 2016 | October 18, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the HDMV and EFAV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, HDMV is up 5.25% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAV has returned 5.4%. That puts EFAV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HDMV or EFAV?
Year-to-date, the HDMV ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to -$41M for EFAV.
Which ETF is more volatile: HDMV or EFAV?
Over the past year, HDMV had a volatility of 11.17%, while EFAV experienced 11.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: HDMV or EFAV?
As of March 10, 2026, HDMV holds $16.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFAV manages $5.41 B.
What sectors do the HDMV and EFAV ETFs invest in?
HDMV leans toward sectors like Financials, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, EFAV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the HDMV ETF and EFAV ETF?
HDMV top holdings include OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING, MTR CORPORATION and CLP HOLDINGS. EFAV holds in its top three: NOVARTIS, DBS GROUP HOLDINGS and SWISSCOM.
Which ETF is more diversified: HDMV or EFAV?
HDMV holds 138 securities with 23.98% of its assets in the top 15. EFAV has 243 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.85%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
