Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
HAWXvsDBAWETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
The ETFs iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) track the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Net Total Return Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. HAWX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. HAWX is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. DBAW performs worse with 4.92% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HAWX and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
HAWX vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HAWX DBAW | -2.44%-2.32% | +6.12%+6.58% | +5.12%+4.92% | +28.02%+26.82% | +70.64%+66.77% | +74.38%+71.22% |
| Flows | HAWX DBAW | -$2M- | +$4M+$6M | +$3M- | +$13M+$34M | +$51M+$31M | +$130M+$67M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HAWX DBAW | +13.35%+11.71% | +15.20%+12.32% | +12.43%+10.41% | +13.11%+10.85% |
| Max drawdown | HAWX DBAW | -6.13%-6.77% | -13.76%-13.17% | -13.76%-13.33% | -17.33%-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | HAWX DBAW | 13d9d | 51d55d | 51d84d | 573d576d |
HAWX | DBAW | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.49 | $43.36 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $41.49 | $43.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
HAWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
HAWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.49 | $43.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | +0.32% |
| AuM | $315.11 M | $232.67 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.4% |
HAWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1591 | 1704 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 29, 2015 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the HAWX and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, HAWX is up 5.12% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 4.92%. That puts HAWX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HAWX or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the HAWX ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to - for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: HAWX or DBAW?
Over the past year, HAWX had a volatility of 15.2%, while DBAW experienced 12.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: HAWX or DBAW?
As of March 10, 2026, HAWX holds $315.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $232.67 M.
What sectors do the HAWX and DBAW ETFs invest in?
HAWX leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the HAWX ETF and DBAW ETF?
HAWX top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. DBAW holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: HAWX or DBAW?
HAWX holds 1731 securities with 17.17% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 1846 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.39%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
