HAPvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. HAP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. HAP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.41%, versus 0.58% for REMX. HAP is up 29.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$56M in YTD flows. REMX performs worse with 3.33% YTD performance, and +$736M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of HAP and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
HAP vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HAP REMX | +10.01%+13.00% | +6.09%-24.83% | +29.62%+3.33% | +43.86%+27.59% | +68.08%+9.47% | +92.00%-26.58% |
| Flows | HAP REMX | -$4M+$33M | -$31M-$100M | +$56M+$736M | +$77M+$1.46B | +$93M+$1.68B | +$142M+$1.54B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | HAP REMX | +15.55%+42.01% | +15.51%+42.51% | +15.55%+35.80% | +17.81%+35.68% |
| Max drawdown | HAP REMX | -7.68%-35.96% | -9.00%-40.08% | -16.54%-53.20% | -25.54%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | HAP REMX | 66d92d | 97d119d | 251d758d | 1147d1612d |
Trading data
HAP | REMX | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 7:58 PM | $77.89 | $76.26 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $76.93 | $76.29 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
HAP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 7:58 PM
Live
Closed
HAP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.89 | $76.26 |
| 1D performance | +1.25% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $326.99 M | $2.23 B |
| E/R | 0.41% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
HAP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | VanEck |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index | MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 120 | 29 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 29, 2008 | October 27, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
HAP
USA
42.09%
Canada
14.47%
United Kingdom
7.19%
Other
36.25%
REMX
China
31.86%
Australia
24.73%
USA
22.48%
Other
20.93%
Sectors
HAP
Non-Energy Materi.
38.18%
Energy
26.69%
Industrials
10.92%
Utilities
9.15%
Other
15.05%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
91.59%
Other
8.41%
Advertisement
Diversification
HAP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
HAP
Deere & Co.
5.15%
US30233Q1085
5.02%
Chevron Corp.
4.87%
Iberdrola SA
3.99%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.83%
Bayer AG
3.81%
Corteva, Inc.
3.35%
BHP Group Ltd.
3.12%
Nutrien Ltd.
2.36%
Shell Plc
2.09%
Rio Tinto Plc
1.82%
TotalEnergies SE
1.76%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
1.69%
Newmont Corp.
1.52%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.48%
REMX
Albemarle Corp.
8.09%
PLS Group Ltd.
7.56%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
7.50%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
MP Materials Corp.
5.91%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.83%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.67%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.04%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.34%
TW0007610B14
4.25%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.91%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.67%
Liontown Ltd.
3.03%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about HAP and REMX
How have the HAP and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, HAP is up 29.62% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has returned 3.33%. That puts HAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: HAP or REMX?
Year-to-date, the HAP ETF saw +$56M in flows, compared to +$736M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: HAP or REMX?
Over the past year, HAP had a volatility of 15.51%, while REMX experienced 42.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: HAP or REMX?
As of September 2, 2026, HAP holds $326.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $2.23 B.
What sectors do the HAP and REMX ETFs invest in?
HAP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the HAP ETF and REMX ETF?
HAP top holdings include Deere & Co., US30233Q1085 and Chevron Corp.. REMX holds in its top three: Albemarle Corp., PLS Group Ltd. and China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: HAP or REMX?
HAP holds 120 securities with 45.86% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.11%.
Advertisement
Latest news about HAP & REMX
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
Advertisement
