Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GXUSvsCWIETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. GXUS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CWI's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. GXUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.3% for CWI. GXUS is up 4.91% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. CWI performs worse with 4.23% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXUS and CWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GXUS vs CWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXUS CWI | -3.65%-4.59% | +7.09%+5.51% | +4.91%+4.23% | +29.73%+30.79% | n/a+65.11% | n/a+48.61% |
| Flows | GXUS CWI | -- | -+$71M | -+$7M | -$36K+$295M | -+$244M | -+$371M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXUS CWI | +14.45%+13.90% | +14.44%+14.23% | n/a+12.47% | n/a+13.65% |
| Max drawdown | GXUS CWI | -8.10%-7.79% | -13.10%-13.36% | n/a-13.36% | n/a-29.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXUS CWI | 9d10d | 44d43d | n/a43d | n/a1056d |
GXUS | CWI | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:37 PM | $58.47 | $36.83 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $58.53 | $37.54 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GXUS | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GXUS | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.47 | $36.83 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -1.89% |
| AuM | $586.35 M | $2.45 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.3% |
GXUS | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Global ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 2559 | 1006 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 7, 2023 | January 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GXUS and CWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GXUS is up 4.91% year-to-date (YTD), while CWI has returned 4.23%. That puts GXUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXUS or CWI?
Year-to-date, the GXUS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$7M for CWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXUS or CWI?
Over the past year, GXUS had a volatility of 14.44%, while CWI experienced 14.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXUS or CWI?
As of March 10, 2026, GXUS holds $586.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while CWI manages $2.45 B.
What sectors do the GXUS and CWI ETFs invest in?
GXUS leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CWI focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GXUS ETF and CWI ETF?
GXUS top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. CWI holds in its top three: US8740391003, ASML HOLDING and US7960508882.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXUS or CWI?
GXUS holds 2773 securities with 15.9% of its assets in the top 15. CWI has 1100 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.51%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
