Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GXUSvsACWXETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. GXUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. GXUS is up 2.29% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. ACWX performs better with 4.88% YTD performance, and +$744M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXUS and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GXUS vs ACWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXUS ACWX | -5.38%-3.68% | +4.70%+6.06% | +2.29%+4.88% | +26.49%+30.59% | n/a+63.87% | n/a+47.59% |
| Flows | GXUS ACWX | -+$387M | -+$996M | -+$744M | -$36K+$2.34B | -+$2.34B | -+$3.60B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXUS ACWX | +13.53%+14.83% | +14.26%+15.26% | n/a+13.45% | n/a+14.95% |
| Max drawdown | GXUS ACWX | -8.10%-7.09% | -13.10%-13.37% | n/a-13.37% | n/a-30.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXUS ACWX | 8d13d | 44d43d | n/a43d | n/a1065d |
GXUS | ACWX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.47 | $70.22 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $58.53 | $70.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GXUS | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GXUS | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.47 | $70.22 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $571.73 M | $8.98 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.32% |
GXUS | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Global ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 2559 | 1591 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 7, 2023 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GXUS and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GXUS is up 2.29% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 4.88%. That puts ACWX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXUS or ACWX?
Year-to-date, the GXUS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$744M for ACWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXUS or ACWX?
Over the past year, GXUS had a volatility of 14.26%, while ACWX experienced 15.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXUS or ACWX?
As of March 9, 2026, GXUS holds $571.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $8.98 B.
What sectors do the GXUS and ACWX ETFs invest in?
GXUS leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GXUS ETF and ACWX ETF?
GXUS top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. ACWX holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXUS or ACWX?
GXUS holds 2773 securities with 15.9% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1731 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.93%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
