GXCvsMCHETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, MCH's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Non-Energy Materials. GXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.79% for MCH. GXC is down -16.99% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. MCH performs better with -16.03% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and MCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GXC vs MCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC MCH | -7.71%-12.14% | -11.02%-14.71% | -16.99%-16.03% | -20.84%-20.05% | +24.65%+27.29% | -19.15%n/a |
| Flows | GXC MCH | --$4M | +$5M-$4M | +$19M-$4M | +$43M-$4M | -$407M-$8M | -$619M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC MCH | +14.29%+18.69% | +18.08%+22.06% | +22.28%+25.37% | +24.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GXC MCH | -13.98%-19.33% | -22.91%-21.49% | -23.35%-23.38% | -46.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC MCH | 81d81d | 274d274d | 393d309d | 1400dn/a |
Trading data
GXC | MCH | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 3:16 PM | $82.15 | $24.03 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $80.79 | $24.19 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCH
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGXC | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 3:16 PM
Live
Closed
GXC | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $82.15 | $24.03 |
| 1D performance | +1.68% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $421.81 M | $15.25 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
GXC | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Matthews Asia |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1233 | 53 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | July 13, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GXC
China
86.4%
Other
13.6%
MCH
China
87.45%
Hong Kong
8%
Other
4.55%
Sectors
GXC
Technology
23.62%
Finance
20.21%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.72%
Industrials
8.99%
Healthcare
7.63%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.28%
Other
18.55%
MCH
Finance
29.48%
Technology
26.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.55%
Industrials
9.45%
Healthcare
7.34%
Other
16.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.8%
MCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.44%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.68%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.67%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.59%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.20%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.82%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.73%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.59%
Meituan
1.48%
NetEase, Inc.
1.26%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.24%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.03%
JD.com, Inc.
0.98%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
0.96%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
0.78%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.78%
MCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.93%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.90%
China Construction Bank Corp.
4.79%
Meituan
3.96%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
3.42%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
3.14%
China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
2.97%
Bank of Ningbo Co., Ltd.
2.85%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
2.80%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.60%
China Merchants Securities Co., Ltd.
2.54%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.45%
JD.com, Inc.
2.42%
Jiangsu Zhongtian Technology Co., Ltd.
2.42%
Kingboard Holdings Ltd.
2.26%
Frequently asked questions about GXC and MCH
How have the GXC and MCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, GXC is down -16.99% year-to-date (YTD), while MCH has lost -16.03%. That puts MCH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or MCH?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to -$4M for MCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or MCH?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 18.08%, while MCH experienced 22.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or MCH?
As of October 30, 2026, GXC holds $421.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while MCH manages $15.25 M.
What sectors do the GXC and MCH ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, MCH focuses on Finance, Technology and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and MCH ETF?
GXC top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. MCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or MCH?
GXC holds 1302 securities with 36.8% of its assets in the top 15. MCH has 54 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.44%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GXC & MCH
Andrew Mattock - Matthews China Active ETF (MCH)
March 15, 2023
MCH
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
December 8, 2022
GXC
Exploring fresh dividend investing strategies and foreign stocks
September 17, 2022
MCH
Advertisement
Advertisement
