GXCvsKBAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.6%
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. GXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.79% for KBA. GXC is down -5.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. KBA performs better with 6.12% YTD performance, and -$91M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GXC vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC KBA | +4.37%-0.73% | -3.72%-1.33% | -5.42%+6.12% | +1.74%+31.59% | +25.74%+40.39% | -11.09%+3.26% |
| Flows | GXC KBA | +$13M-$5M | +$13M-$45M | +$14M-$91M | +$28M-$92M | -$644M-$273M | -$647M-$266M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC KBA | +19.88%+26.64% | +18.90%+19.94% | +22.52%+19.23% | +24.96%+20.06% |
| Max drawdown | GXC KBA | -13.27%-8.43% | -19.17%-8.43% | -23.08%-22.23% | -48.72%-45.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC KBA | 89d42d | 306d42d | 284d417d | 1792d1604d |
Trading data
GXC | KBA | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $91.80 | $33.50 |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $91.95 | $33.22 |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GXC | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GXC | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $91.80 | $33.50 |
| 1D performance | -0.16% | +0.84% |
| AuM | $476.05 M | $144.13 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
GXC | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 1141 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GXC
China
88.17%
Other
11.83%
KBA
China
99.24%
Other
0.76%
Sectors
GXC
Technology
26.48%
Finance
19.04%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.73%
Industrials
9.92%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.2%
Other
23.62%
KBA
Technology
38.86%
Industrials
17.22%
Finance
16.02%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.28%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.08%
Other
13.54%
Advertisement
Diversification
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.01%
KBA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
61.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.92%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
6.76%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.07%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.92%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.78%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.53%
Meituan
1.47%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.43%
NetEase, Inc.
1.34%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.27%
JD.com, Inc.
1.06%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.02%
Baidu, Inc.
0.96%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.78%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
0.70%
KBA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
8.51%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
7.24%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
5.13%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
5.01%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
4.41%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
4.33%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
4.33%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
3.92%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
3.29%
CMOC Group Ltd.
2.97%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.63%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.51%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.49%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
2.47%
Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.47%
Frequently asked questions about GXC and KBA
How have the GXC and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, GXC is down -5.42% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has returned 6.12%. That puts KBA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or KBA?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to -$91M for KBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or KBA?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 18.9%, while KBA experienced 19.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or KBA?
As of August 4, 2026, GXC holds $476.05 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $144.13 M.
What sectors do the GXC and KBA ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and KBA ETF?
GXC top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp.. KBA holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. and Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or KBA?
GXC holds 1204 securities with 35.01% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.71%.
Advertisement
Latest news about GXC & KBA
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KBA
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
December 8, 2022
GXC
Advertisement
Advertisement
