Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GXCvsKBAETF Comparison
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Materials. GXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.79% for KBA. GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. KBA performs worse with -0.65% YTD performance, and -$37M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GXC vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC KBA | -4.66%-0.97% | -0.10%+1.29% | -0.46%-0.65% | +12.52%+31.18% | +34.55%+27.28% | -20.17%+1.08% |
| Flows | GXC KBA | +$10M-$6M | +$25M-$42M | +$20M-$37M | -$9M-$36M | -$679M-$268M | -$428M-$288M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC KBA | +17.09%+13.66% | +20.14%+16.47% | +22.52%+18.22% | +25.12%+19.70% |
| Max drawdown | GXC KBA | -10.13%-5.50% | -19.48%-11.76% | -25.32%-26.79% | -55.20%-46.36% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC KBA | 41d63d | 121d105d | 528d528d | 1826d1743d |
GXC | KBA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.05 | $30.36 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $97.21 | $30.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GXC | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GXC | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.05 | $30.36 |
| 1D performance | -1.19% | -1.39% |
| AuM | $509.61 M | $185.55 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.79% |
GXC | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 1052 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GXC and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has lost -0.65%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or KBA?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to -$37M for KBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or KBA?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 20.14%, while KBA experienced 16.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or KBA?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC holds $509.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $185.55 M.
What sectors do the GXC and KBA ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and KBA ETF?
GXC top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK. KBA holds in its top three: ZIJIN MINING, AMPEREX TECH and MOUTAI.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or KBA?
GXC holds 1177 securities with 41.25% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.38%.
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
