Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GXCvsFLCHETF Comparison
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. GXC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -1.81% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GXC vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC FLCH | -4.66%-5.10% | -0.10%-1.76% | -0.46%-1.81% | +12.52%+10.16% | +34.55%+35.53% | -20.17%-21.63% |
| Flows | GXC FLCH | +$10M- | +$25M+$48M | +$20M- | -$9M+$83M | -$679M+$124M | -$428M+$178M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC FLCH | +17.09%+18.00% | +20.14%+22.40% | +22.52%+23.46% | +25.12%+26.83% |
| Max drawdown | GXC FLCH | -10.13%-11.25% | -19.48%-19.96% | -25.32%-26.38% | -55.20%-57.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC FLCH | 41d41d | 121d122d | 528d528d | 1826d1826d |
GXC | FLCH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.05 | $23.12 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $97.21 | $23.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GXC | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GXC | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.05 | $23.12 |
| 1D performance | -1.19% | -0.77% |
| AuM | $509.61 M | $271.60 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.19% |
GXC | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 1052 | 883 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GXC and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -1.81%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to - for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or FLCH?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 20.14%, while FLCH experienced 22.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or FLCH?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC holds $509.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $271.60 M.
What sectors do the GXC and FLCH ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and FLCH ETF?
GXC top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK. FLCH holds in its top three: TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or FLCH?
GXC holds 1177 securities with 41.25% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 955 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.88%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.