Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GXCvsCXSEETF Comparison
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, CXSE's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Communication Services. GXC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.32% for CXSE. GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. CXSE performs worse with -2.09% YTD performance, and +$46M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and CXSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GXC vs CXSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC CXSE | -4.66%-4.25% | -0.10%-2.39% | -0.46%-2.09% | +12.52%+15.43% | +34.55%+23.88% | -20.17%-38.46% |
| Flows | GXC CXSE | +$10M+$6M | +$25M+$50M | +$20M+$46M | -$9M+$48M | -$679M-$225M | -$428M+$283M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC CXSE | +17.09%+17.87% | +20.14%+23.45% | +22.52%+24.54% | +25.12%+28.42% |
| Max drawdown | GXC CXSE | -10.13%-10.89% | -19.48%-20.13% | -25.32%-31.48% | -55.20%-64.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC CXSE | 41d56d | 121d120d | 528d529d | 1826d1826d |
GXC | CXSE | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.05 | $38.79 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $97.21 | $39.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GXC | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GXC | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.05 | $38.79 |
| 1D performance | -1.19% | -1.15% |
| AuM | $509.61 M | $538.31 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.32% |
GXC | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index |
| N° of holdings | 1052 | 215 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | September 19, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GXC and CXSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD), while CXSE has lost -2.09%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or CXSE?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to +$46M for CXSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or CXSE?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 20.14%, while CXSE experienced 23.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or CXSE?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC holds $509.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while CXSE manages $538.31 M.
What sectors do the GXC and CXSE ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, CXSE focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Information Technology and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and CXSE ETF?
GXC top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK. CXSE holds in its top three: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD, TENCENT HOLDINGS and AMPEREX TECH.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or CXSE?
GXC holds 1177 securities with 41.25% of its assets in the top 15. CXSE has 261 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.42%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
