Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GXCvsASHRETF Comparison
SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. GXC's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, ASHR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. GXC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.65% for ASHR. GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. ASHR performs better with 2.6% YTD performance, and -$265M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GXC and ASHR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GXC vs ASHR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GXC ASHR | -4.66%-0.59% | -0.10%+4.75% | -0.46%+2.60% | +12.52%+28.51% | +34.55%+24.92% | -20.17%-5.23% |
| Flows | GXC ASHR | +$10M-$226M | +$25M-$210M | +$20M-$265M | -$9M-$1.14B | -$679M-$990M | -$428M-$195M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GXC ASHR | +17.09%+12.79% | +20.14%+15.72% | +22.52%+21.10% | +25.12%+20.67% |
| Max drawdown | GXC ASHR | -10.13%-3.39% | -19.48%-12.08% | -25.32%-30.96% | -55.20%-45.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | GXC ASHR | 41d13d | 121d97d | 528d505d | 1826d1748d |
GXC | ASHR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $96.05 | $33.60 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $97.21 | $33.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GXC | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GXC | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $96.05 | $33.60 |
| 1D performance | -1.19% | -0.97% |
| AuM | $509.61 M | $1.58 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.65% |
GXC | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | S&P China BMI Index | CSI 300 Index |
| N° of holdings | 1052 | 273 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 20, 2007 | November 5, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GXC and ASHR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC is down -0.46% year-to-date (YTD), while ASHR has returned 2.6%. That puts ASHR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GXC or ASHR?
Year-to-date, the GXC ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to -$265M for ASHR.
Which ETF is more volatile: GXC or ASHR?
Over the past year, GXC had a volatility of 20.14%, while ASHR experienced 15.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: GXC or ASHR?
As of March 11, 2026, GXC holds $509.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while ASHR manages $1.58 B.
What sectors do the GXC and ASHR ETFs invest in?
GXC leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, ASHR focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GXC ETF and ASHR ETF?
GXC top holdings include TENCENT HOLDINGS, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD and CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK. ASHR holds in its top three: AMPEREX TECH, MOUTAI and CN PING AN.
Which ETF is more diversified: GXC or ASHR?
GXC holds 1177 securities with 41.25% of its assets in the top 15. ASHR has 285 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.38%.
Tap Into China's Core: Two ETFs for Domestic Stock Market Access
Chinese ETFs surge after Zero-COVID policy is relaxed
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
