Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GVUSvsVONVETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. GVUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.06% for VONV. GVUS is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$18M in YTD flows. VONV performs worse with 3.72% YTD performance, and +$1.47B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GVUS and VONV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GVUS vs VONV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GVUS VONV | -2.64%-2.79% | +5.35%+3.65% | +4.02%+3.72% | +19.15%+18.92% | n/a+56.67% | n/a+60.54% |
| Flows | GVUS VONV | -+$1.45B | -$18M+$1.61B | -$18M+$1.47B | -$52M+$3.54B | -+$6.05B | -+$8.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GVUS VONV | +11.01%+10.74% | +15.69%+15.68% | n/a+13.07% | n/a+14.96% |
| Max drawdown | GVUS VONV | -3.43%-3.45% | -12.05%-12.06% | n/a-15.61% | n/a-19.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | GVUS VONV | 8d9d | 52d52d | n/a213d | n/a700d |
GVUS | VONV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.90 | $95.51 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $56.01 | $95.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GVUS | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GVUS | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.90 | $95.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $403.25 M | $16.48 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.06% |
GVUS | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index | Russell 1000 Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 786 | 789 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 29, 2023 | September 20, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GVUS and VONV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GVUS is up 4.02% year-to-date (YTD), while VONV has returned 3.72%. That puts GVUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GVUS or VONV?
Year-to-date, the GVUS ETF saw -$18M in flows, compared to +$1.47B for VONV.
Which ETF is more volatile: GVUS or VONV?
Over the past year, GVUS had a volatility of 15.69%, while VONV experienced 15.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: GVUS or VONV?
As of March 9, 2026, GVUS holds $403.25 M in assets under management (AUM), while VONV manages $16.48 B.
What sectors do the GVUS and VONV ETFs invest in?
GVUS leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, VONV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GVUS ETF and VONV ETF?
GVUS top holdings include BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL. VONV holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: GVUS or VONV?
GVUS holds 848 securities with 23.92% of its assets in the top 15. VONV has 869 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.03%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
