GVIPvsSAWGETF Comparison
VS
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GVIP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, SAWG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. GVIP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.49% for SAWG. GVIP is up 11.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$64M in YTD flows. SAWG performs worse with 8.18% YTD performance, and +$466K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GVIP and SAWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GVIP vs SAWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GVIP SAWG | -4.43%+1.48% | +3.76%+5.58% | +11.38%+8.18% | +23.81%+16.60% | +97.16%n/a | +77.97%n/a |
| Flows | GVIP SAWG | +$18M-$0K | +$33M+$466K | +$64M+$466K | +$102M+$472K | +$218M- | +$170M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GVIP SAWG | +28.00%+13.47% | +21.47%+12.96% | +20.20%n/a | +21.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GVIP SAWG | -8.64%-3.47% | -13.66%-11.37% | -23.14%n/a | -37.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GVIP SAWG | 17d41d | 75d79d | 128dn/a | 835dn/a |
Trading data
GVIP | SAWG | |
Last sale 7/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $172.52 | $23.95 |
| Previous close 07/17/2026 | $172.54 | $24.03 |
| Consolidated volume 07/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SAWG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGVIP | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GVIP | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $172.52 | $23.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | -0.34% |
| AuM | $555.51 M | $2.88 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
GVIP | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Advisors Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 40 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2016 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GVIP
USA
87.11%
Other
12.89%
SAWG
USA
97.82%
Other
2.18%
Sectors
GVIP
Technology
42.81%
Industrials
14.62%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
8.22%
Other
20.63%
SAWG
Technology
52.83%
Healthcare
14.09%
Finance
8.03%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.65%
Industrials
7.13%
Other
10.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
GVIP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33%
SAWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
GVIP
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.56%
Applovin Corp.
2.34%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.32%
Sandisk Corp.
2.30%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.21%
Abivax SA
2.21%
Talen Energy Corp.
2.21%
Vistra Corp.
2.19%
Lam Research Corp.
2.14%
Core Scientific, Inc.
2.12%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.10%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
2.09%
Carvana Co.
2.08%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
2.07%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
2.06%
SAWG
NVIDIA Corp.
7.26%
Microsoft Corp.
6.59%
Apple, Inc.
6.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.56%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.16%
Broadcom Inc.
3.81%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.71%
Exelixis, Inc.
3.34%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.96%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.86%
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
2.83%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.80%
Visa, Inc.
2.74%
Incyte Corp.
2.66%
CME Group, Inc.
2.46%
Frequently asked questions about GVIP and SAWG
How have the GVIP and SAWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, GVIP is up 11.38% year-to-date (YTD), while SAWG has returned 8.18%. That puts GVIP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GVIP or SAWG?
Year-to-date, the GVIP ETF saw +$64M in flows, compared to +$466K for SAWG.
Which ETF is more volatile: GVIP or SAWG?
Over the past year, GVIP had a volatility of 21.47%, while SAWG experienced 12.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: GVIP or SAWG?
As of July 17, 2026, GVIP holds $555.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while SAWG manages $2.88 M.
What sectors do the GVIP and SAWG ETFs invest in?
GVIP leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, SAWG focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the GVIP ETF and SAWG ETF?
GVIP top holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Applovin Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. SAWG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GVIP or SAWG?
GVIP holds 49 securities with 33% of its assets in the top 15. SAWG has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.24%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
