GVIPvsFTGSETF Comparison
VS
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. GVIP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FTGS's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. GVIP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.6% for FTGS. GVIP is up 11.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$64M in YTD flows. FTGS performs worse with 7.54% YTD performance, and -$70M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GVIP and FTGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GVIP vs FTGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GVIP FTGS | -4.43%+1.71% | +3.76%+4.68% | +11.38%+7.54% | +23.81%+11.03% | +97.16%+58.67% | +77.97%n/a |
| Flows | GVIP FTGS | +$18M+$42K | +$33M-$12M | +$64M-$70M | +$102M-$8M | +$218M+$1.01B | +$170M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GVIP FTGS | +28.00%+12.51% | +21.47%+13.37% | +20.20%+16.56% | +21.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GVIP FTGS | -8.64%-3.94% | -13.66%-9.44% | -23.14%-20.04% | -37.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GVIP FTGS | 17d32d | 75d171d | 128d112d | 835dn/a |
Trading data
GVIP | FTGS | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $172.54 | $37.47 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $173.98 | $37.98 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GVIP | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GVIP | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $172.54 | $37.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.83% | -1.35% |
| AuM | $555.51 M | $1.28 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
GVIP | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index | The Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 49 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2016 | October 26, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GVIP
USA
87.11%
Other
12.89%
FTGS
USA
96.38%
Other
3.62%
Sectors
GVIP
Technology
42.81%
Industrials
14.62%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
8.22%
Other
20.63%
FTGS
Technology
34.07%
Healthcare
17.15%
Industrials
12.53%
Finance
11.55%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.36%
Other
17.34%
Advertisement
Diversification
GVIP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33%
FTGS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.68%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
GVIP
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.56%
Applovin Corp.
2.34%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.32%
Sandisk Corp.
2.30%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.21%
Abivax SA
2.21%
Talen Energy Corp.
2.21%
Vistra Corp.
2.19%
Lam Research Corp.
2.14%
Core Scientific, Inc.
2.12%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.10%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
2.09%
Carvana Co.
2.08%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
2.07%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
2.06%
FTGS
Fortinet, Inc.
3.49%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
3.48%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.73%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
2.59%
Applovin Corp.
2.50%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.35%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.27%
DexCom, Inc.
2.27%
Monster Beverage Corp.
2.25%
Broadcom Inc.
2.20%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.16%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
2.13%
Microsoft Corp.
2.11%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
2.11%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.04%
Frequently asked questions about GVIP and FTGS
How have the GVIP and FTGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, GVIP is up 11.38% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGS has returned 7.54%. That puts GVIP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GVIP or FTGS?
Year-to-date, the GVIP ETF saw +$64M in flows, compared to -$70M for FTGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: GVIP or FTGS?
Over the past year, GVIP had a volatility of 21.47%, while FTGS experienced 13.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: GVIP or FTGS?
As of July 17, 2026, GVIP holds $555.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTGS manages $1.28 B.
What sectors do the GVIP and FTGS ETFs invest in?
GVIP leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FTGS focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GVIP ETF and FTGS ETF?
GVIP top holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Applovin Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. FTGS holds in its top three: Fortinet, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and ServiceNow, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GVIP or FTGS?
GVIP holds 49 securities with 33% of its assets in the top 15. FTGS has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.68%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
