GVIPvsFFLCETF Comparison
VS
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is part of the Global Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. GVIP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.38% for FFLC. GVIP is up 8.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$90M in YTD flows. FFLC performs better with 11.94% YTD performance, and +$204M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GVIP and FFLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GVIP vs FFLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GVIP FFLC | +0.40%+0.75% | -6.35%-0.05% | +8.05%+11.94% | +9.41%+15.33% | +94.47%+84.50% | +65.72%+113.16% |
| Flows | GVIP FFLC | +$4M+$39M | +$30M+$43M | +$90M+$204M | +$107M+$223M | +$239M+$828M | +$191M+$868M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GVIP FFLC | +22.54%+11.02% | +23.01%+13.64% | +20.84%+15.63% | +22.32%+16.60% |
| Max drawdown | GVIP FFLC | -10.08%-3.67% | -14.89%-9.91% | -23.14%-19.59% | -37.10%-19.59% |
| Max drawdown duration | GVIP FFLC | 92d63d | 107d63d | 128d153d | 835d153d |
Trading data
GVIP | FFLC | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 5:58 PM | $163.37 | $58.68 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $167.12 | $59.32 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FFLC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGVIP | FFLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 5:58 PM
Live
Closed
GVIP | FFLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $163.37 | $58.68 |
| 1D performance | -2.25% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $564.00 M | $1.25 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
GVIP | FFLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 108 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2016 | June 2, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GVIP
USA
84.34%
Other
15.66%
FFLC
USA
89.41%
Other
10.59%
Sectors
GVIP
Technology
37.07%
Finance
16.08%
Industrials
13.82%
Healthcare
8.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.37%
Other
16.14%
FFLC
Technology
42.44%
Finance
13.88%
Industrials
10.91%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.89%
Healthcare
9.2%
Other
12.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
GVIP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.26%
FFLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
GVIP
DoorDash, Inc.
2.26%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
2.23%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
2.19%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
2.19%
Norfolk Southern Corp.
2.18%
Visa, Inc.
2.18%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.17%
S&P Global, Inc.
2.15%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
2.14%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
2.12%
Coupang, Inc.
2.12%
Apple, Inc.
2.12%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.08%
Microsoft Corp.
2.07%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
2.07%
FFLC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.87%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.78%
Microsoft Corp.
4.84%
Apple, Inc.
4.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.78%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.46%
Broadcom Inc.
2.22%
Visa, Inc.
1.96%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.96%
The Boeing Co.
1.78%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.67%
Bank of America Corp.
1.65%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.56%
Western Digital Corp.
1.43%
Frequently asked questions about GVIP and FFLC
How have the GVIP and FFLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, GVIP is up 8.05% year-to-date (YTD), while FFLC has returned 11.94%. That puts FFLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GVIP or FFLC?
Year-to-date, the GVIP ETF saw +$90M in flows, compared to +$204M for FFLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GVIP or FFLC?
Over the past year, GVIP had a volatility of 23.01%, while FFLC experienced 13.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: GVIP or FFLC?
As of October 15, 2026, GVIP holds $564.00 M in assets under management (AUM), while FFLC manages $1.25 B.
What sectors do the GVIP and FFLC ETFs invest in?
GVIP leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, FFLC focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GVIP ETF and FFLC ETF?
GVIP top holdings include DoorDash, Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. and Revolution Medicines, Inc.. FFLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GVIP or FFLC?
GVIP holds 50 securities with 32.26% of its assets in the top 15. FFLC has 108 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.16%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
