Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GURUvsSAMTETF Comparison
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. GURU's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SAMT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. GURU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.66% for SAMT. GURU is down -5.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$570K in YTD flows. SAMT performs better with 3.14% YTD performance, and +$111M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GURU and SAMT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GURU vs SAMT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GURU SAMT | -3.20%+1.07% | -7.09%+3.03% | -5.60%+3.14% | +22.10%+40.02% | +76.21%+89.58% | +27.13%n/a |
| Flows | GURU SAMT | -$577K+$32M | -$570K+$149M | -$570K+$111M | -$386K+$325M | -$18M+$337M | -$27M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GURU SAMT | +14.36%+16.53% | +19.84%+17.92% | +16.58%+15.21% | +20.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GURU SAMT | -8.02%-7.83% | -14.85%-10.05% | -20.65%-18.49% | -38.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GURU SAMT | 77d51d | 46d38d | 134d127d | 1160dn/a |
GURU | SAMT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.05 | $39.37 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $59.94 | $39.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GURU | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GURU | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.05 | $39.37 |
| 1D performance | -1.48% | -0.83% |
| AuM | $53.66 M | $494.27 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.66% |
GURU | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Strategas Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Solactive Guru Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 65 | 32 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2012 | January 24, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GURU and SAMT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GURU is down -5.6% year-to-date (YTD), while SAMT has returned 3.14%. That puts SAMT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GURU or SAMT?
Year-to-date, the GURU ETF saw -$570K in flows, compared to +$111M for SAMT.
Which ETF is more volatile: GURU or SAMT?
Over the past year, GURU had a volatility of 19.84%, while SAMT experienced 17.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: GURU or SAMT?
As of March 12, 2026, GURU holds $53.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while SAMT manages $494.27 M.
What sectors do the GURU and SAMT ETFs invest in?
GURU leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SAMT focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the GURU ETF and SAMT ETF?
GURU top holdings include MODINE MNFC CO, US5787841007 and US2528281080. SAMT holds in its top three: US03214Q1085, AMERISOURCEBERGEN and QUANTA SERVICES.
Which ETF is more diversified: GURU or SAMT?
GURU holds 76 securities with 22.95% of its assets in the top 15. SAMT has 32 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.39%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
