Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GUNRvsCGWETF Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund ETF
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund ETF (GUNR) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. GUNR's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. In contrast, CGW's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. GUNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.59% for CGW. GUNR is up 19.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$492M in YTD flows. CGW performs worse with 1.65% YTD performance, and +$26M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GUNR and CGW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GUNR vs CGW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GUNR CGW | +4.00%-5.99% | +21.47%+1.34% | +19.92%+1.65% | +49.53%+16.82% | +45.91%+41.73% | +74.76%+42.63% |
| Flows | GUNR CGW | +$93M+$5M | +$492M+$26M | +$492M+$26M | +$429M-$2M | -$1.43B-$196M | +$618M-$85M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GUNR CGW | +17.77%+11.90% | +15.38%+13.96% | +14.64%+13.43% | +16.90%+15.49% |
| Max drawdown | GUNR CGW | -3.97%-6.98% | -12.82%-9.36% | -18.53%-15.88% | -23.49%-32.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | GUNR CGW | 10d14d | 65d35d | 427d140d | 1239d862d |
GUNR | CGW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.13 | $63.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $55.02 | $63.85 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GUNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GUNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.13 | $63.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.62% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $7.41 B | $1.02 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.59% |
GUNR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index | S&P Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 117 | 60 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 16, 2011 | May 14, 2007 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GUNR and CGW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GUNR is up 19.92% year-to-date (YTD), while CGW has returned 1.65%. That puts GUNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GUNR or CGW?
Year-to-date, the GUNR ETF saw +$492M in flows, compared to +$26M for CGW.
Which ETF is more volatile: GUNR or CGW?
Over the past year, GUNR had a volatility of 15.38%, while CGW experienced 13.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: GUNR or CGW?
As of March 12, 2026, GUNR holds $7.41 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGW manages $1.02 B.
What sectors do the GUNR and CGW ETFs invest in?
GUNR leans toward sectors like Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, CGW focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GUNR ETF and CGW ETF?
GUNR top holdings include EXXON, CORTEVA INC and CHEVRON TEXACO. CGW holds in its top three: COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GUNR or CGW?
GUNR holds 120 securities with 44.29% of its assets in the top 15. CGW has 62 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.4%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
