GTOQvsSCYBETF Comparison
VS
Invesco High Yield Bond Factor ETF (GTOQ) belongs to the Intl HY Bonds segment. Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is part of the US Corporate HY Bonds segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Consumer Services and Industrials. GTOQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.03% for SCYB. GTOQ is down -4.33% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. SCYB performs better with 0.04% YTD performance, and +$878M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GTOQ and SCYB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GTOQ vs SCYB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GTOQ SCYB | -2.49%-1.59% | -3.90%-2.00% | -4.33%+0.04% | -3.03%+1.51% | +18.64%+26.38% | +11.38%n/a |
| Flows | GTOQ SCYB | -$23M-$2M | -$23M+$175M | +$22M+$878M | +$52M+$1.16B | +$115M+$2.84B | +$123M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GTOQ SCYB | +3.37%+3.04% | +3.27%+2.77% | +3.61%+3.36% | +4.84%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GTOQ SCYB | -3.96%-2.84% | -4.94%-2.84% | -4.94%-3.88% | -15.42%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GTOQ SCYB | 64d50d | 270d50d | 270d72d | 722dn/a |
Trading data
GTOQ | SCYB | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.51 | $25.08 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $21.61 | $25.16 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 19, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GTOQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGTOQ | SCYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GTOQ | SCYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.51 | $25.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.43% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $151.69 M | $2.77 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
GTOQ | SCYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index |
| N° of holdings | 467 | 1244 |
| Asset class | - | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 12, 2020 | July 11, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GTOQ
USA
85.69%
Other
14.31%
SCYB
USA
88.13%
Other
11.87%
Sectors
GTOQ
Finance
21.63%
Consumer Services
11.68%
Industrials
10.88%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.6%
Energy
9.36%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.67%
Other
28.18%
SCYB
Finance
18.03%
Consumer Services
12.72%
Industrials
11.4%
Energy
8.37%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.13%
Technology
7.78%
Other
33.57%
Advertisement
Diversification
GTOQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.88%
SCYB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
GTOQ
Rakuten Group, 9.75% 15apr2029, USD
0.74%
Core Scientific Finance I, 7.75% 15may2031, USD
0.69%
American Airlines, 7.25% 15feb2028, USD
0.66%
APLD ComputeCo 2, 6.75% 15mar2031, USD
0.61%
Venture Global LNG, 9.5% 1feb2029, USD
0.60%
Edged Compute, 7.5% 30apr2031, USD
0.59%
Albertsons Companies Inc, 5.75% 31mar2034, USD
0.58%
Clarivate Science Holdings, 3.875% 1jul2028, USD
0.57%
Sunoco LP, 5.875% 15mar2028, USD
0.57%
Asurion LLC, 8% 31dec2032, USD
0.56%
Brink's Co, 4.625% 15oct2027, USD
0.56%
Dream Finders Homes, 6.875% 15sep2030, USD
0.55%
Meridian Arc HoldCo, 6.25% 30apr2031, USD
0.54%
PR RNO Property Owner 1, 6.5% 1may2031, USD
0.53%
Global Aircraft Leasing, 8.75% 1sep2027, USD
0.53%
SCYB
1261229 B.C., 10% 15apr2032, USD
0.63%
Meridian Arc HoldCo, 6.25% 30apr2031, USD
0.53%
PR RNO Property Owner 1, 6.5% 1may2031, USD
0.40%
EchoStar, 10.75% 30nov2029, USD
0.40%
Quikrete Holdings, 6.375% 1mar2032, USD
0.37%
Galaxy Helios Data Center II, 9.875% 1aug2031, USD
0.37%
Cloud Software Group, 6.5% 31mar2029, USD
0.36%
SV RNO Property Owner 1, 5.875% 1mar2031, USD
0.34%
Nexstar Media, 6.5% 15sep2033, USD
0.31%
Cloud Software Group, 9% 30sep2029, USD
0.31%
Asurion LLC, 8% 31dec2032, USD
0.31%
Core Scientific Finance I, 7.75% 15may2031, USD
0.30%
Centene, 4.625% 15dec2029, USD
0.30%
Asurion LLC, 8.375% 1feb2034, USD
0.28%
Warner Bros. Discovery, 5.05% 15mar2042, USD
0.27%
Frequently asked questions about GTOQ and SCYB
How have the GTOQ and SCYB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, GTOQ is down -4.33% year-to-date (YTD), while SCYB has returned 0.04%. That puts SCYB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GTOQ or SCYB?
Year-to-date, the GTOQ ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$878M for SCYB.
Which ETF is more volatile: GTOQ or SCYB?
Over the past year, GTOQ had a volatility of 3.27%, while SCYB experienced 2.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: GTOQ or SCYB?
As of October 16, 2026, GTOQ holds $151.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCYB manages $2.77 B.
What sectors do the GTOQ and SCYB ETFs invest in?
GTOQ leans toward sectors like Finance, Consumer Services and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCYB focuses on Finance, Consumer Services and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GTOQ ETF and SCYB ETF?
GTOQ top holdings include Rakuten Group, 9.75% 15apr2029, USD, Core Scientific Finance I, 7.75% 15may2031, USD and American Airlines, 7.25% 15feb2028, USD. SCYB holds in its top three: 1261229 B.C., 10% 15apr2032, USD, Meridian Arc HoldCo, 6.25% 30apr2031, USD and PR RNO Property Owner 1, 6.5% 1may2031, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: GTOQ or SCYB?
GTOQ holds 471 securities with 8.88% of its assets in the top 15. SCYB has 1251 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.46%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
