GSSTvsPULSETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Ultra Short Bond ETF (GSST) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) belong to the same industry segment: Money Market Bonds. GSST is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.15% for PULS. GSST is up 0.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$178M in YTD flows. PULS performs better with 0.87% YTD performance, and +$1.25B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSST and PULS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSST vs PULS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSST PULS | +0.06%+0.12% | +0.75%+0.87% | +0.75%+0.87% | +4.53%+4.69% | +17.48%+17.99% | +19.31%+21.43% |
| Flows | GSST PULS | +$21M+$424M | +$178M+$1.26B | +$178M+$1.25B | +$607M+$3.65B | +$854M+$10.26B | +$1.14B+$13.27B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSST PULS | +0.35%+0.32% | +0.36%+0.35% | +0.43%+0.34% | +0.47%+0.39% |
| Max drawdown | GSST PULS | -0.08%-0.04% | -0.17%-0.32% | -0.17%-0.32% | -1.18%-0.53% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSST PULS | 26d7d | 14d20d | 14d20d | 453d380d |
GSST | PULS | |
Last sale 4/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.37 | $49.52 |
| Previous close 03/31/2026 | $50.55 | $49.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
GSST | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.37 | $49.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $1.41 B | $14.60 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.15% |
GSST | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | PGIM |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 15, 2019 | April 5, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
