GSSCvsIWMIETF Comparison
ETF 1
GSSC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+1.32%
VS
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. GSSC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.78% for IWMI. GSSC is up 18.99% year-to-date (YTD) with +$171M in YTD flows. IWMI performs worse with 16.1% YTD performance, and +$619M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSSC and IWMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GSSC vs IWMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSSC IWMI | -1.93%-1.78% | +7.80%+5.66% | +18.99%+16.10% | +30.38%+30.25% | +51.85%n/a | +51.16%n/a |
| Flows | GSSC IWMI | +$18M+$128M | +$26M+$298M | +$171M+$619M | +$257M+$836M | +$288M- | +$407M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSSC IWMI | +16.37%+15.01% | +18.50%+15.42% | +20.47%n/a | +21.43%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GSSC IWMI | -4.60%-3.47% | -10.69%-8.39% | -25.99%n/a | -27.32%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GSSC IWMI | 19d16d | 84d46d | 289dn/a | 977dn/a |
Trading data
GSSC | IWMI | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $89.15 | $51.76 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $89.49 | $52.00 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IWMI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGSSC | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GSSC | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $89.15 | $51.76 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $1.11 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.78% |
Characteristics
GSSC | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1402 | 1944 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2017 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GSSC
USA
92.03%
Other
7.97%
IWMI
USA
93.39%
Other
6.61%
Sectors
GSSC
Finance
22.71%
Healthcare
20.38%
Technology
14.07%
Industrials
9.92%
Other
32.92%
IWMI
Finance
25.22%
Healthcare
19.61%
Technology
12.64%
Industrials
11.25%
Other
31.29%
Diversification
GSSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.39%
IWMI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
GSSC
Alkermes Plc
0.40%
Enova International, Inc.
0.37%
StoneX Group, Inc.
0.32%
Travere Therapeutics, Inc.
0.32%
Dave, Inc.
0.30%
Sezzle, Inc.
0.29%
Argan, Inc.
0.28%
10X Genomics, Inc.
0.28%
EnerSys
0.28%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.26%
Extreme Networks, Inc.
0.26%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.26%
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
0.26%
Victoria's Secret & Co.
0.26%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.25%
IWMI
Moog, Inc.
0.37%
Hut 8 Corp.
0.36%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.35%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.35%
Cytokinetics, Inc.
0.34%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.34%
Argan, Inc.
0.33%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.32%
JFrog Ltd.
0.30%
Riot Platforms, Inc.
0.30%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.30%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
0.28%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
0.28%
Old National Bancorp
0.28%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.27%
Frequently asked questions about GSSC and IWMI
How have the GSSC and IWMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, GSSC is up 18.99% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMI has returned 16.1%. That puts GSSC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSSC or IWMI?
Year-to-date, the GSSC ETF saw +$171M in flows, compared to +$619M for IWMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSSC or IWMI?
Over the past year, GSSC had a volatility of 18.5%, while IWMI experienced 15.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSSC or IWMI?
As of July 30, 2026, GSSC holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWMI manages $1.11 B.
What sectors do the GSSC and IWMI ETFs invest in?
GSSC leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, IWMI focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the GSSC ETF and IWMI ETF?
GSSC top holdings include Alkermes Plc, Enova International, Inc. and StoneX Group, Inc.. IWMI holds in its top three: Moog, Inc., Hut 8 Corp. and ViaSat, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: GSSC or IWMI?
GSSC holds 1411 securities with 4.39% of its assets in the top 15. IWMI has 2000 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.76%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
