Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSJYvsJPXNETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. GSJY's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, JPXN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. GSJY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.48% for JPXN. GSJY is up 6.51% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. JPXN performs better with 7.19% YTD performance, and +$101M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSJY and JPXN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSJY vs JPXN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSJY JPXN | -7.80%-7.97% | +6.89%+6.36% | +6.51%+7.19% | +29.14%+31.46% | +64.35%+65.56% | +45.88%+43.08% |
| Flows | GSJY JPXN | -+$74M | +$10M+$101M | +$10M+$101M | +$26M+$101M | +$49M+$122M | +$41M+$105M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSJY JPXN | +24.27%+20.37% | +24.16%+19.90% | +21.46%+17.67% | +20.24%+17.56% |
| Max drawdown | GSJY JPXN | -11.62%-8.97% | -17.99%-13.96% | -18.92%-15.27% | -33.01%-33.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSJY JPXN | 26d28d | 46d37d | 235d225d | 903d903d |
GSJY | JPXN | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.37 | $90.80 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $49.25 | $92.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSJY | JPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSJY | JPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.37 | $90.80 |
| 1D performance | -1.77% | -1.85% |
| AuM | $79.14 M | $208.43 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.48% |
GSJY | JPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index | JPX-Nikkei 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 168 | 390 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2016 | October 23, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSJY and JPXN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSJY is up 6.51% year-to-date (YTD), while JPXN has returned 7.19%. That puts JPXN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSJY or JPXN?
Year-to-date, the GSJY ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$101M for JPXN.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSJY or JPXN?
Over the past year, GSJY had a volatility of 24.16%, while JPXN experienced 19.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSJY or JPXN?
As of March 10, 2026, GSJY holds $79.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while JPXN manages $208.43 M.
What sectors do the GSJY and JPXN ETFs invest in?
GSJY leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, JPXN focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSJY ETF and JPXN ETF?
GSJY top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. JPXN holds in its top three: ADVANTEST, MIZUHO FINANCIAL and MITSUI.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSJY or JPXN?
GSJY holds 168 securities with 34.32% of its assets in the top 15. JPXN has 392 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.08%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
