Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSJYvsHEWJETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. GSJY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 1.02% for HEWJ. GSJY is up 6.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. HEWJ performs better with 6.85% YTD performance, and +$255M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSJY and HEWJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSJY vs HEWJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSJY HEWJ | -8.06%-5.72% | +6.95%+7.40% | +6.62%+6.85% | +30.92%+41.13% | +65.62%+122.97% | +45.40%+137.86% |
| Flows | GSJY HEWJ | -+$249M | +$10M+$258M | +$10M+$255M | +$26M+$331M | +$49M+$455M | +$41M+$305M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSJY HEWJ | +24.27%+20.37% | +24.12%+23.18% | +21.45%+20.07% | +20.24%+18.75% |
| Max drawdown | GSJY HEWJ | -11.62%-7.25% | -17.99%-16.14% | -18.92%-21.20% | -33.01%-21.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSJY HEWJ | 27d15d | 46d45d | 235d351d | 903d351d |
GSJY | HEWJ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.88 | $55.77 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.37 | $56.28 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSJY | HEWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSJY | HEWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.88 | $55.77 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $79.22 M | $776.40 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 1.02% |
GSJY | HEWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 168 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2016 | January 31, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSJY and HEWJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GSJY is up 6.62% year-to-date (YTD), while HEWJ has returned 6.85%. That puts HEWJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSJY or HEWJ?
Year-to-date, the GSJY ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$255M for HEWJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSJY or HEWJ?
Over the past year, GSJY had a volatility of 24.12%, while HEWJ experienced 23.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSJY or HEWJ?
As of March 11, 2026, GSJY holds $79.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while HEWJ manages $776.40 M.
What sectors do the GSJY and HEWJ ETFs invest in?
GSJY leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, HEWJ focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSJY ETF and HEWJ ETF?
GSJY top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. HEWJ holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSJY or HEWJ?
GSJY holds 168 securities with 34.32% of its assets in the top 15. HEWJ has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.06%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
