Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSJYvsEWJETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. GSJY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.49% for EWJ. GSJY is up 6.51% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. EWJ performs worse with 6.27% YTD performance, and +$3.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSJY and EWJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSJY vs EWJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSJY EWJ | -7.80%-8.69% | +6.89%+5.62% | +6.51%+6.27% | +29.14%+31.08% | +64.35%+65.21% | +45.88%+42.06% |
| Flows | GSJY EWJ | -+$2.66B | +$10M+$3.37B | +$10M+$3.07B | +$26M+$2.52B | +$49M+$4.16B | +$41M+$2.46B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSJY EWJ | +24.27%+21.47% | +24.16%+21.38% | +21.46%+18.50% | +20.24%+18.07% |
| Max drawdown | GSJY EWJ | -11.62%-9.86% | -17.99%-14.78% | -18.92%-15.70% | -33.01%-33.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSJY EWJ | 26d28d | 46d37d | 235d225d | 903d902d |
GSJY | EWJ | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.37 | $84.19 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $49.25 | $85.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSJY | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSJY | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.37 | $84.19 |
| 1D performance | -1.77% | -1.80% |
| AuM | $79.14 M | $19.47 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.49% |
GSJY | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 168 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2016 | March 12, 1996 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSJY and EWJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSJY is up 6.51% year-to-date (YTD), while EWJ has returned 6.27%. That puts GSJY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSJY or EWJ?
Year-to-date, the GSJY ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$3.07B for EWJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSJY or EWJ?
Over the past year, GSJY had a volatility of 24.16%, while EWJ experienced 21.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSJY or EWJ?
As of March 10, 2026, GSJY holds $79.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while EWJ manages $19.47 B.
What sectors do the GSJY and EWJ ETFs invest in?
GSJY leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EWJ focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSJY ETF and EWJ ETF?
GSJY top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. EWJ holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSJY or EWJ?
GSJY holds 168 securities with 34.32% of its assets in the top 15. EWJ has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.21%.
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
Japan Stocks Outperform Amid Controlled Inflation and Accommodating Monetary Policy
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
