Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSJYvsDBJPETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. GSJY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.45% for DBJP. GSJY is up 6.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. DBJP performs better with 7% YTD performance, and +$120M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSJY and DBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSJY vs DBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSJY DBJP | -8.06%-5.18% | +6.95%+6.41% | +6.62%+7.00% | +30.92%+41.57% | +65.62%+118.37% | +45.40%+136.53% |
| Flows | GSJY DBJP | -+$21M | +$10M+$120M | +$10M+$120M | +$26M+$64M | +$49M+$104M | +$41M+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSJY DBJP | +24.27%+22.86% | +24.12%+23.17% | +21.45%+21.45% | +20.24%+19.62% |
| Max drawdown | GSJY DBJP | -11.62%-9.16% | -17.99%-18.53% | -18.92%-25.81% | -33.01%-25.81% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSJY DBJP | 27d12d | 46d63d | 235d350d | 903d350d |
GSJY | DBJP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.88 | $100.25 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.37 | $101.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSJY | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSJY | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.88 | $100.25 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -0.88% |
| AuM | $79.22 M | $585.82 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.45% |
GSJY | DBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 168 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 2, 2016 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSJY and DBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, GSJY is up 6.62% year-to-date (YTD), while DBJP has returned 7%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSJY or DBJP?
Year-to-date, the GSJY ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$120M for DBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSJY or DBJP?
Over the past year, GSJY had a volatility of 24.12%, while DBJP experienced 23.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSJY or DBJP?
As of March 11, 2026, GSJY holds $79.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBJP manages $585.82 M.
What sectors do the GSJY and DBJP ETFs invest in?
GSJY leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, DBJP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSJY ETF and DBJP ETF?
GSJY top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. DBJP holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSJY or DBJP?
GSJY holds 168 securities with 34.32% of its assets in the top 15. DBJP has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.31%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
