Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSIEvsHEFAETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. GSIE's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, HEFA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. GSIE is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.7% for HEFA. GSIE is up 2.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$216M in YTD flows. HEFA performs better with 3.86% YTD performance, and -$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSIE and HEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSIE vs HEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSIE HEFA | -4.35%-3.38% | +5.59%+4.77% | +2.98%+3.86% | +25.42%+23.07% | +59.77%+67.30% | +56.20%+87.32% |
| Flows | GSIE HEFA | +$41M+$40M | +$216M+$31M | +$216M-$8M | +$625M-$1.75B | +$711M+$1.69B | +$1.79B+$2.71B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSIE HEFA | +13.19%+12.91% | +14.73%+16.42% | +12.89%+13.11% | +14.16%+13.58% |
| Max drawdown | GSIE HEFA | -7.37%-5.70% | -13.08%-14.30% | -13.08%-14.34% | -29.44%-14.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSIE HEFA | 9d14d | 37d51d | 37d65d | 911d381d |
GSIE | HEFA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.32 | $42.52 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $44.02 | $42.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSIE | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSIE | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.32 | $42.52 |
| 1D performance | -1.59% | -0.96% |
| AuM | $5.24 B | $6.94 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.7% |
GSIE | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 598 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 6, 2015 | January 31, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSIE and HEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSIE is up 2.98% year-to-date (YTD), while HEFA has returned 3.86%. That puts HEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSIE or HEFA?
Year-to-date, the GSIE ETF saw +$216M in flows, compared to -$8M for HEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSIE or HEFA?
Over the past year, GSIE had a volatility of 14.73%, while HEFA experienced 16.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSIE or HEFA?
As of March 10, 2026, GSIE holds $5.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while HEFA manages $6.94 B.
What sectors do the GSIE and HEFA ETFs invest in?
GSIE leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, HEFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GSIE ETF and HEFA ETF?
GSIE top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS. HEFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSIE or HEFA?
GSIE holds 629 securities with 12.67% of its assets in the top 15. HEFA has 695 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.01%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
