Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSIEvsFEDMETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. GSIE's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FEDM's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. GSIE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.14% for FEDM. GSIE is up 2.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$216M in YTD flows. FEDM performs worse with 1.41% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSIE and FEDM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSIE vs FEDM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSIE FEDM | -4.35%-4.79% | +5.59%+3.71% | +2.98%+1.41% | +25.42%+20.40% | +59.77%+48.50% | +56.20%n/a |
| Flows | GSIE FEDM | +$41M- | +$216M+$2M | +$216M+$2M | +$625M+$16M | +$711M+$25M | +$1.79B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSIE FEDM | +13.19%+13.68% | +14.73%+15.02% | +12.89%+13.18% | +14.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown | GSIE FEDM | -7.37%-7.61% | -13.08%-12.85% | -13.08%-14.86% | -29.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GSIE FEDM | 9d9d | 37d38d | 37d214d | 911dn/a |
GSIE | FEDM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.32 | $58.74 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $44.02 | $59.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSIE | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSIE | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.32 | $58.74 |
| 1D performance | -1.59% | -1.90% |
| AuM | $5.24 B | $76.83 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.14% |
GSIE | FEDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index | Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index |
| N° of holdings | 598 | 211 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 6, 2015 | September 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSIE and FEDM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSIE is up 2.98% year-to-date (YTD), while FEDM has returned 1.41%. That puts GSIE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSIE or FEDM?
Year-to-date, the GSIE ETF saw +$216M in flows, compared to +$2M for FEDM.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSIE or FEDM?
Over the past year, GSIE had a volatility of 14.73%, while FEDM experienced 15.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSIE or FEDM?
As of March 10, 2026, GSIE holds $5.24 B in assets under management (AUM), while FEDM manages $76.83 M.
What sectors do the GSIE and FEDM ETFs invest in?
GSIE leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FEDM focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GSIE ETF and FEDM ETF?
GSIE top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and NOVARTIS. FEDM holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROYAL BK CANADA and SIEMENS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSIE or FEDM?
GSIE holds 629 securities with 12.67% of its assets in the top 15. FEDM has 220 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.78%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
