Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSIDvsHEFAETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. GSID's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, HEFA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. GSID is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.7% for HEFA. GSID is up 1.27% year-to-date (YTD) with -$80M in YTD flows. HEFA performs better with 3.78% YTD performance, and +$39M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSID and HEFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSID vs HEFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSID HEFA | -6.19%-2.86% | +3.85%+5.06% | +1.27%+3.78% | +21.76%+22.07% | +53.23%+64.32% | +50.36%+87.52% |
| Flows | GSID HEFA | -+$87M | -$87M+$87M | -$80M+$39M | -$100M-$1.67B | +$218M+$1.74B | +$321M+$2.76B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSID HEFA | +13.56%+12.92% | +15.99%+16.44% | +13.73%+13.15% | +15.09%+13.58% |
| Max drawdown | GSID HEFA | -8.10%-5.70% | -14.37%-14.30% | -14.37%-14.34% | -29.33%-14.65% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSID HEFA | 8d13d | 42d51d | 42d65d | 897d381d |
GSID | HEFA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.57 | $42.93 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $71.88 | $42.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSID | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSID | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.57 | $42.93 |
| 1D performance | -0.42% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $892.45 M | $6.98 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.7% |
GSID | HEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 841 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 12, 2020 | January 31, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSID and HEFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GSID is up 1.27% year-to-date (YTD), while HEFA has returned 3.78%. That puts HEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSID or HEFA?
Year-to-date, the GSID ETF saw -$80M in flows, compared to +$39M for HEFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSID or HEFA?
Over the past year, GSID had a volatility of 15.99%, while HEFA experienced 16.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSID or HEFA?
As of March 9, 2026, GSID holds $892.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while HEFA manages $6.98 B.
What sectors do the GSID and HEFA ETFs invest in?
GSID leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, HEFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GSID ETF and HEFA ETF?
GSID top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. HEFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSID or HEFA?
GSID holds 889 securities with 17.33% of its assets in the top 15. HEFA has 695 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.01%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
