Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSIDvsEFAXETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EFAX) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. GSID's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, EFAX's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. GSID is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.2% for EFAX. GSID is up 3.72% year-to-date (YTD) with -$80M in YTD flows. EFAX performs worse with 1.32% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSID and EFAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSID vs EFAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSID EFAX | -4.59%-5.98% | +6.13%+2.68% | +3.72%+1.32% | +24.71%+22.35% | +57.80%+57.26% | +53.49%+47.46% |
| Flows | GSID EFAX | -- | -$87M+$30M | -$80M+$5M | -$100M+$83M | +$218M+$122M | +$321M+$209M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSID EFAX | +14.40%+14.83% | +16.13%+16.30% | +13.80%+13.90% | +15.13%+15.08% |
| Max drawdown | GSID EFAX | -8.10%-8.50% | -14.37%-14.17% | -14.37%-14.22% | -29.33%-31.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSID EFAX | 9d10d | 42d41d | 42d53d | 897d910d |
GSID | EFAX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $70.57 | $50.32 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $71.57 | $51.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSID | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSID | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $70.57 | $50.32 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -1.61% |
| AuM | $914.09 M | $480.46 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.2% |
GSID | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid cap Index | MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index |
| N° of holdings | 841 | 610 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 12, 2020 | October 24, 2016 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSID and EFAX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, GSID is up 3.72% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAX has returned 1.32%. That puts GSID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSID or EFAX?
Year-to-date, the GSID ETF saw -$80M in flows, compared to +$5M for EFAX.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSID or EFAX?
Over the past year, GSID had a volatility of 16.13%, while EFAX experienced 16.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSID or EFAX?
As of March 10, 2026, GSID holds $914.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFAX manages $480.46 M.
What sectors do the GSID and EFAX ETFs invest in?
GSID leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, EFAX focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GSID ETF and EFAX ETF?
GSID top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS. EFAX holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSID or EFAX?
GSID holds 889 securities with 17.33% of its assets in the top 15. EFAX has 642 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.71%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
