Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GSEEvsBKEMETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
The ETFs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GSEE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) track the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap NTR Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. GSEE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.11% for BKEM. GSEE is up 3.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$12M in YTD flows. BKEM performs better with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GSEE and BKEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GSEE vs BKEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GSEE BKEM | -5.29%-5.24% | +5.61%+5.78% | +3.71%+3.83% | +32.29%+32.60% | +59.37%+58.75% | +24.07%+21.62% |
| Flows | GSEE BKEM | -+$8M | -$12M+$8M | -$12M+$8M | -$17M-$63M | +$49M-$38M | +$55M+$20M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GSEE BKEM | +19.93%+19.95% | +16.96%+17.12% | +14.30%+14.58% | +15.11%+15.94% |
| Max drawdown | GSEE BKEM | -9.94%-9.92% | -12.88%-13.26% | -15.26%-15.84% | -34.94%-35.98% |
| Max drawdown duration | GSEE BKEM | 11d11d | 52d52d | 230d245d | 1504d1512d |
GSEE | BKEM | |
Last sale 3/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.64 | $81.97 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $60.39 | $81.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GSEE | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GSEE | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.64 | $81.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | +0.74% |
| AuM | $122.93 M | $74.74 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.11% |
GSEE | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Goldman Sachs | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 1730 | 1517 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 12, 2020 | April 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GSEE and BKEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, GSEE is up 3.71% year-to-date (YTD), while BKEM has returned 3.83%. That puts BKEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GSEE or BKEM?
Year-to-date, the GSEE ETF saw -$12M in flows, compared to +$8M for BKEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: GSEE or BKEM?
Over the past year, GSEE had a volatility of 16.96%, while BKEM experienced 17.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: GSEE or BKEM?
As of March 9, 2026, GSEE holds $122.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKEM manages $74.74 M.
What sectors do the GSEE and BKEM ETFs invest in?
GSEE leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BKEM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GSEE ETF and BKEM ETF?
GSEE top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS. BKEM holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GSEE or BKEM?
GSEE holds 1895 securities with 32.67% of its assets in the top 15. BKEM has 1670 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.8%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
