Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPZvsSCOWETF Comparison
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. GRPZ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, SCOW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. GRPZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.59% for SCOW. GRPZ is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SCOW performs worse with -2.14% YTD performance, and +$512K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPZ and SCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPZ vs SCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPZ SCOW | -7.89%-4.18% | -3.38%-5.90% | +0.99%-2.14% | +19.07%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GRPZ SCOW | -- | -$1K+$512K | -+$512K | -$5K- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPZ SCOW | +16.57%+18.42% | +22.34%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPZ SCOW | -8.72%-6.87% | -14.71%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPZ SCOW | 33d81d | 46dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
GRPZ | SCOW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.81 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.80 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPZ | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPZ | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.81 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | – |
| AuM | $2.68 M | $1.44 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.59% |
GRPZ | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 89 | 74 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 27, 2024 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPZ and SCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, GRPZ is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD), while SCOW has lost -2.14%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPZ or SCOW?
Year-to-date, the GRPZ ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$512K for SCOW.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPZ or SCOW?
As of March 13, 2026, GRPZ holds $2.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCOW manages $1.44 M.
What sectors do the GRPZ and SCOW ETFs invest in?
GRPZ leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCOW focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the GRPZ ETF and SCOW ETF?
GRPZ top holdings include INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC and POWELL INDUSTRIES. SCOW holds in its top three: JACKSON FINANCIAL INC, MARKETAXESS and INTERDIGITAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPZ or SCOW?
GRPZ holds 90 securities with 25.48% of its assets in the top 15. SCOW has 75 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
