Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPZvsPSCETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF (PSC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. GRPZ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, PSC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. GRPZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for PSC. GRPZ is up 0.96% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. PSC performs worse with 0.85% YTD performance, and +$266M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPZ and PSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPZ vs PSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPZ PSC | -6.81%-4.26% | -3.71%-2.07% | +0.96%+0.85% | +17.31%+21.92% | n/a+52.91% | n/a+34.13% |
| Flows | GRPZ PSC | -+$103M | -$1K+$312M | -+$266M | -$5K+$944M | -+$1.39B | -+$492M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPZ PSC | +16.58%+16.87% | +22.39%+21.59% | n/a+19.67% | n/a+20.89% |
| Max drawdown | GRPZ PSC | -8.72%-6.32% | -14.71%-13.88% | n/a-23.69% | n/a-25.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPZ PSC | 32d48d | 46d45d | n/a284d | n/a844d |
GRPZ | PSC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.81 | $56.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.80 | $56.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPZ | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPZ | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.81 | $56.86 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $2.68 M | $1.80 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
GRPZ | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Principal Global Investors |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 89 | 439 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 27, 2024 | September 21, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPZ and PSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, GRPZ is up 0.96% year-to-date (YTD), while PSC has returned 0.85%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPZ or PSC?
Year-to-date, the GRPZ ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$266M for PSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPZ or PSC?
Over the past year, GRPZ had a volatility of 22.39%, while PSC experienced 21.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPZ or PSC?
As of March 12, 2026, GRPZ holds $2.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while PSC manages $1.80 B.
What sectors do the GRPZ and PSC ETFs invest in?
GRPZ leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, PSC focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GRPZ ETF and PSC ETF?
GRPZ top holdings include INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC and POWELL INDUSTRIES. PSC holds in its top three: COEUR MINING INC, TTM TECHNOLOGIES and GUARDANT HEALTH INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPZ or PSC?
GRPZ holds 90 securities with 25.48% of its assets in the top 15. PSC has 444 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.42%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
