Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
GRPZvsGSSCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (GSSC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. GRPZ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, GSSC's top sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Industrials. GRPZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.2% for GSSC. GRPZ is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. GSSC performs worse with 0.2% YTD performance, and +$134M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPZ and GSSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
GRPZ vs GSSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPZ GSSC | -7.89%-5.20% | -3.38%-3.36% | +0.99%+0.20% | +19.07%+21.02% | n/a+46.32% | n/a+24.28% |
| Flows | GRPZ GSSC | -- | -$1K+$137M | -+$134M | -$5K+$250M | -+$245M | -+$405M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPZ GSSC | +16.57%+16.91% | +22.34%+22.32% | n/a+20.59% | n/a+21.59% |
| Max drawdown | GRPZ GSSC | -8.72%-7.02% | -14.71%-15.00% | n/a-25.99% | n/a-27.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPZ GSSC | 33d48d | 46d46d | n/a289d | n/a977d |
GRPZ | GSSC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.81 | $73.99 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.80 | $74.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
GRPZ | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
GRPZ | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.81 | $73.99 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | -0.34% |
| AuM | $2.68 M | $855.44 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.2% |
GRPZ | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 89 | 1210 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 27, 2024 | June 28, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the GRPZ and GSSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, GRPZ is up 0.99% year-to-date (YTD), while GSSC has returned 0.2%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPZ or GSSC?
Year-to-date, the GRPZ ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$134M for GSSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPZ or GSSC?
Over the past year, GRPZ had a volatility of 22.34%, while GSSC experienced 22.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPZ or GSSC?
As of March 13, 2026, GRPZ holds $2.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSSC manages $855.44 M.
What sectors do the GRPZ and GSSC ETFs invest in?
GRPZ leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, GSSC focuses on Health Care, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPZ ETF and GSSC ETF?
GRPZ top holdings include INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC and POWELL INDUSTRIES. GSSC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, IES HOLDINGS and COMPASS.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPZ or GSSC?
GRPZ holds 90 securities with 25.48% of its assets in the top 15. GSSC has 1322 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.25%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
