GRPZvsFSCCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. GRPZ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, FSCC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. GRPZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. GRPZ is up 15.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$590K in YTD flows. FSCC performs better with 19.46% YTD performance, and +$186M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPZ and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GRPZ vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPZ FSCC | +5.53%+8.15% | +15.22%+20.69% | +15.91%+19.46% | +26.80%+42.82% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GRPZ FSCC | -$590K+$55M | -$590K+$100M | -$590K+$186M | -$1M+$241M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPZ FSCC | +16.62%+21.28% | +17.73%+19.46% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPZ FSCC | -5.05%-5.01% | -9.35%-11.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPZ FSCC | 35d8d | 67d83d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
GRPZ | FSCC | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.69 | $35.86 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $30.27 | $35.18 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGRPZ | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GRPZ | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.69 | $35.86 |
| 1D performance | +1.38% | +1.94% |
| AuM | $2.46 M | $294.90 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
GRPZ | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 86 | 267 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 27, 2024 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GRPZ
USA
93.37%
Other
6.63%
FSCC
USA
77.69%
Other
22.31%
Sectors
GRPZ
Financials
27.25%
Health Care
15.41%
Industrials
15.21%
Energy
12.84%
Consumer Discreti.
12.64%
Information Techn.
9%
Other
7.65%
FSCC
Industrials
16.85%
Information Techn.
15.34%
Financials
14.58%
Health Care
13.71%
Consumer Discreti.
7.19%
Other
32.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
GRPZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.46%
FSCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
GRPZ
POWELL INDUSTRIES
3.34%
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS
2.62%
TIDEWATER
2.54%
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC
2.08%
DXP ENTERPRISES
2.05%
LIBERTY OILFIELD SERVICES
1.88%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC
1.80%
TG THERAPEUTICS
1.77%
AZZ
1.77%
CACTUS INC
1.75%
CLEAR SECURE
1.73%
AXOS FINANCIAL INC
1.66%
ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION
1.53%
CAL MAINE FOODS
1.47%
AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES
1.46%
FSCC
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.63%
PRIMORIS SERVICES
1.58%
POWELL INDUSTRIES
1.35%
MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1.28%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC
1.26%
BANKUNITED
1.18%
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN ENTERTAINMENT CORP
1.14%
SPS COMMERCE
1.09%
EMCOR GROUP
1.01%
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS SER
0.99%
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP
0.97%
FB FINANCIAL
0.94%
POSTAL REALTY TRUST INC
0.91%
FLUOR
0.90%
TALOS ENERGY INC
0.87%
Frequently asked questions about GRPZ and FSCC
How have the GRPZ and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, GRPZ is up 15.91% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 19.46%. That puts FSCC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPZ or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the GRPZ ETF saw -$590K in flows, compared to +$186M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPZ or FSCC?
Over the past year, GRPZ had a volatility of 17.73%, while FSCC experienced 19.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPZ or FSCC?
As of June 18, 2026, GRPZ holds $2.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $294.90 M.
What sectors do the GRPZ and FSCC ETFs invest in?
GRPZ leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the GRPZ ETF and FSCC ETF?
GRPZ top holdings include POWELL INDUSTRIES, INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS and TIDEWATER. FSCC holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, PRIMORIS SERVICES and POWELL INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPZ or FSCC?
GRPZ holds 87 securities with 29.46% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 269 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
