GRPZvsFSCCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. GRPZ's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, FSCC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. GRPZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.51% for FSCC. GRPZ is up 13.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FSCC performs worse with 10.74% YTD performance, and +$120M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of GRPZ and FSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
GRPZ vs FSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GRPZ FSCC | +11.83%+11.62% | +6.08%+4.62% | +13.05%+10.74% | +33.48%+45.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | GRPZ FSCC | -+$34M | -+$85M | -+$120M | -$5K+$177M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | GRPZ FSCC | +17.40%+21.27% | +18.05%+19.41% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | GRPZ FSCC | -9.35%-10.67% | -9.35%-11.07% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | GRPZ FSCC | 67d64d | 67d83d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
GRPZ | FSCC | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.76 | $32.88 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $29.97 | $33.24 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FSCC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexGRPZ | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
GRPZ | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.76 | $32.88 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $3.00 M | $210.12 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.51% |
Characteristics
GRPZ | FSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 86 | 274 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 27, 2024 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
GRPZ
USA
93.48%
Other
6.52%
FSCC
USA
77.88%
Other
22.12%
Sectors
GRPZ
Financials
27.62%
Health Care
15.24%
Industrials
14.62%
Energy
13.23%
Consumer Discreti.
12.84%
Information Techn.
8.83%
Other
7.61%
FSCC
Industrials
16.43%
Financials
14.84%
Health Care
14.5%
Information Techn.
13.93%
Consumer Discreti.
7.26%
Other
33.03%
Diversification
GRPZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.58%
FSCC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.98%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
GRPZ
INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS
2.58%
POWELL INDUSTRIES
2.57%
TIDEWATER
2.57%
DXP ENTERPRISES
1.86%
LIBERTY OILFIELD SERVICES
1.86%
CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1.86%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC
1.82%
TG THERAPEUTICS
1.78%
ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION
1.75%
SM ENERGY
1.72%
AZZ
1.68%
CLEAR SECURE
1.67%
CACTUS INC
1.67%
CAL MAINE FOODS
1.63%
AXOS FINANCIAL INC
1.56%
FSCC
PRIMORIS SERVICES
1.66%
MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC
1.37%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC
1.29%
POWELL INDUSTRIES
1.28%
BANKUNITED
1.23%
SPS COMMERCE
1.16%
MADISON SQUARE GARDEN ENTERTAINMENT CORP
1.12%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
1.08%
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS SER
1.06%
TALOS ENERGY INC
0.99%
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP
0.98%
FB FINANCIAL
0.97%
EMCOR GROUP
0.96%
FLUOR
0.94%
CNX RESOURCES CORP
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about GRPZ and FSCC
How have the GRPZ and FSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, GRPZ is up 13.05% year-to-date (YTD), while FSCC has returned 10.74%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: GRPZ or FSCC?
Year-to-date, the GRPZ ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$120M for FSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: GRPZ or FSCC?
Over the past year, GRPZ had a volatility of 18.05%, while FSCC experienced 19.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: GRPZ or FSCC?
As of April 27, 2026, GRPZ holds $3.00 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSCC manages $210.12 M.
What sectors do the GRPZ and FSCC ETFs invest in?
GRPZ leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, FSCC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the GRPZ ETF and FSCC ETF?
GRPZ top holdings include INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, POWELL INDUSTRIES and TIDEWATER. FSCC holds in its top three: PRIMORIS SERVICES, MIRUM PHARMACEUTICALS INC and JACKSON FINANCIAL INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: GRPZ or FSCC?
GRPZ holds 87 securities with 28.58% of its assets in the top 15. FSCC has 276 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.98%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
